Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.
Why can't we talk about it?
How are we supposed to resolve our differences if every vaccine advocate in the world refuses to have a civil discussion about it?
|
| |||||||||||||||
 |
Executive summary
It’s stunning how the entire world is only being told one side of the narrative by the mainstream media. While we can’t change that, what we can do is to make everyone aware that nobody on the pro-vaccine side will engage in an open, public civil discussion or debate on the relevant issues. I intend to do just that through non-stop advertising all over the world.
Introduction
I am writing this from Auckland Airport in New Zealand awaiting my flight back to San Francisco. I was just informed that my attempt to have a discussion about COVID policies with Michael Laws on The Platform was denied. The message I received read as follows, “He isn’t interested in having his views tested by yours.”
So effectively, I’ve been “de-platformed” by The Platform which bills itself as “New Zealand's only independent media site giving you unbiased coverage, commentary, and opinion and the chance to have your say.” Wow.
This is ridiculous. Enough is enough.
This isn’t about me. Everyone on our side of the narrative is denied an opportunity for an open, public discussion about any issues regarding the COVID response including mandates, masking, vaccines, early treatment, lockdowns, VAERS reporting rates that are off the charts, safety signals deliberately being ignored, trust in public health officials such as ACIP committee chair Grace Lee who doesn’t want to see the Israeli safety data, etc.
It’s time to try a new approach
It’s time for a new approach. I want to make sure that everyone realizes two things:
That the mainstream media is only considering and telling one side of the narrative which means that they are essentially involved in propaganda rather than news.
That NOBODY pushing the narrative is willing to be challenged about their beliefs.
So you might start to see ads in newspapers, radio, TV, online, and on billboards with headlines like:
Why can’t we talk about it?
Why does nobody want to talk about it?
Why is it forbidden to talk about it?
Why are physicians threatened with loss of their jobs if they talk about it?
Why is it taboo to talk about it?
Why can’t we have a civil discussion to resolve our differences about it?
Why are <they> so afraid to talk about it? where <hey> is replaced by local, state, federal lawmakers, government organizations (CDC, NIH, FDA, …), local, state, federal health officials, professional organizations (AMA, CMA, IDSA, etc), infectious disease experts, medical schools, etc.
Our discussion team of experts
I’ve invited the following people to represent our side of the vaccine debate. I don’t expect everyone to accept my invitation or be available for all discussions (should they ever happen). Here’s the initial list which comprises a mixture of people who are experts on our side of the story (in no particular order):
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Joe Mercola
James Thorp
Dr. Naomi Wolf
Del Bigtree
Norman Fenton
Jessica Rose
Mathew Crawford
Joel Smalley
Norman Fenton
Aaron Kheriaty
Pierre Kory
Paul Marik
Peter McCullough
Chris Martenson
Aseem Malhotra
Ira Bernstein
Vinay Julapalli
Bret Weinstein
Ryan Cole
Richard Urso
Aaron Siri
Byram Bridle
Paul Alexander
Retsef Levi
Jay Bhattacharya
Scott Atlas
Will we have a debate?
I predict that no one worldwide will accept our offer to have a discussion/debate on the issues.
So the ad campaign is important to help people realize that they have been misled.
The inevitable outcome
One way or another, this will ultimately lead to a massive loss of trust in:
Congress (and other federal legislative bodies all over the world)
State and local lawmakers
The medical community worldwide, both in academia and in medical practice
Medical organizations (AMA, IDSA, CMA, etc)
Government agencies including the FDA, CDC, NIH
Medical regulators including state licensing boards and certification boards
The mainstream media
Local public health officials
Apparently, that’s the way they want it to end. So be it. They shall have it.
Summary
I’m not content sitting around doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result. It’s time for new, aggressive, in your face tactics that will force the pro-narrative side either to debate us or face public ridicule for refusing to be held accountable for their decisions.
Some people will choose to be on the right side of history early. Others will wait until it is “safe” to switch sides. Sooner or later there will be a “tipping point.”
My goal is to make it sooner and not later.
This is going to be a very expensive campaign. If you want to help enable us to pull this off, please consider becoming a paying subscriber (only $5 a month or $50/yr). Thanks!
Source: Steve Kirsch's newsletter
No comments:
Post a Comment