"A war of values: How the Western woke agenda is pushing nations towards multipolarity" by Lucas Leiroz

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: Strategic Culture Foundation

A war of values: How the Western woke agenda is pushing nations towards multipolarity

Lucas Leiroz

May 22, 2024

With the advancement of issues such as LGBT and queer ideology, conservatives, traditionalists and all groups opposed to Western madness are uniting for geopolitical reconfiguration.

❗️Join us on Telegram, Twitter , and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.

The entire Western world seems to have joined a collective madness. The so-called “woke agenda” has become a kind of basic principle for all of humanity. Trans and LGBT agenda, liberal feminism and all kinds of anti-traditional ideology seem to be more important than any other issue for politicians and state officials in the West.

More than that, these agendas are even being militarized. Recently, NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg stated that the Atlantic military alliance is willing to fight against homophobia and transphobia. In practice, he is simply advancing an agenda that has long been planned by American and European “woke” strategists, which is to establish conditions for the use of force against conservative and traditional nations.

Conservative heads of state have become central enemies of the West in recent years. Until some time ago, pragmatism still predominated in international relations, with domestic moral issues being ignored in Western-allied countries. Saudi Arabia, for example, is a country internationally recognized for imposing extremely strict moral and religious rules, and yet it has always been a great ally of the U.S. However, the situation is rapidly changing.

Saudi Arabia itself was one of the first victims of the Biden administration’s woke anger. The democratic leader created a series of tensions with the Gulf monarchy due to not agreeing with the country’s internal traditions and trying to adapt it to the globalist model of liberal democracy. This was even a vital factor for the Saudis to begin a process of broader cooperation with multipolar powers – which resulted in the peace agreement with Iran brokered by China.

Clearly, Western countries want to build a global order of universal woke values. The “rules” of the world order will also include LGBT and trans agenda. The objective is to take liberal ideology to its ultimate consequences in all countries, extinguishing any traditions, religions or moral values. This seems to be the new phase of the eternal liberal utopia.

More than that, at the domestic level, Western countries are progressively worsening their persecution against conservative-minded ordinary people. On the territory of the Russian Federation, there is a constant and growing arrival of American and European refugees who want to leave their homelands simply because they cannot raise their children without the imposition of a brutal woke ideological agenda. The gender dictatorship and LGBT fascism are generating a wave of migration, already having effects similar to those of major wars and catastrophes.

All of this has great geopolitical relevance. When we analyze the BRICS, we see the group as a true coalition of regional powers whose central common characteristic is the existence of a civilizational value. With Orthodox Russia, Confucian China, Hindu India, Shiite Iran, multi-millennial Egypt, and others, the BRICS prove to be a bloc capable of bringing together civilizations, religions and moral values, which will never be subject to the grotesque “innovations” of the West.

The BRICS, by proposing a geopolitical configuration based on pragmatic and depoliticized international relations, without interventionism in the internal affairs of different civilizations, are simply creating a global alternative to the woke world dictatorship. Only by acting together, in coalition, will the people of the world be able to neutralize the constant and aggressive advance of ultra-liberal ideologies in the West.

It is therefore necessary to go a step further: in their next meetings, it is appropriate that the BRICS members establish once and for all the protection of traditional values, to the detriment of woke fascism, as a common political agenda. It is urgently necessary to bring the moral issue to geopolitical status. If NATO is willing to use force against conservatives and traditionalists around the world, then multipolar powers must be united to stop the spread of Western aggression.

Moral values are also weapons of self-defense for sovereign nations. The West wants to destroy all traditional values because this facilitates its work of psychological warfare and conquering minds. The emerging world must be ready to combat this.

"“The Moral Degeneracy of the anti-Woke” (probably not what you think)." by Billy Bob

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: The Greanville Post

“The Moral Degeneracy of the anti-Woke” (probably not what you think).

May 14, 2024 0 comment 120 Mins read

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

---

Billy Bob's Blowback Roundtable
THE WORLD THROUGH AN INDEPENDENT LEFT LENS

---

Select LanguageAfrikaansAlbanianAmharicArabicArmenianAzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBengaliBosnianBulgarianCatalanCebuanoChichewaChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)CorsicanCroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEsperantoEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrisianGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekGujaratiHaitian CreoleHausaHawaiianHebrewHindiHmongHungarianIcelandicIgboIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseJavaneseKannadaKazakhKhmerKoreanKurdish (Kurmanji)KyrgyzLaoLatinLatvianLithuanianLuxembourgishMacedonianMalagasyMalayMalayalamMalteseMaoriMarathiMongolianMyanmar (Burmese)NepaliNorwegianPashtoPersianPolishPortuguesePunjabiRomanianRussianSamoanScottish GaelicSerbianSesothoShonaSindhiSinhalaSlovakSlovenianSomaliSpanishSundaneseSwahiliSwedishTajikTamilTeluguThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduUzbekVietnameseWelshXhosaYiddishYorubaZulu

By Billy Bob
OpEds

---

As the Red vs. Blue paradigm begins to break down and become less and less useful for ruling class interests, it needs to be strengthened and adapted to current realities if it hopes to defeat the growing groundswell of populist sentiment.

Over the last few days, I have observed a rhetorical effort that purports to explain reality and provide an alternative understanding of the culture war, while simultaneously manipulating those already indoctrinated into conservatism, to support Team Red and the imperialist imperatives of the Western ruling class.

As actual communists, we understand and recognize the top-down effort to increase and agitate the cultural divide that exists among the working class.  A divide that largely results from generations and generations of a two-pronged strategic cultural propaganda effort that was and is intended to destroy working-class unity by hijacking cultural differences and exploiting them for all they are worth.

So what are the features and contours of this new rhetorical effort to corral conservatives away from populism and back into the velvet ropes of "polite" elite discourse?  Well, in a nutshell, they hope to accomplish this feat by spinning a narrative that blames “communism” and alleges a vast “communist conspiracy”.  A communist conspiracy that is responsible for the overt top-down effort to shove “wokeness” down everyone’s throat.

For this narrative to be consistent and have a modicum of plausibility, it must misrepresent communism and appeal to the multi-generation anti-communist indoctrination that all Americans have been immersed in since communism first began to threaten the interests of Western imperialism, well over a hundred years ago.

The misrepresentation of communism hinges on the spurious and preposterous notion that Communism itself is a creation of the elite and is part of their “divide and conquer strategy” which they have employed in their pursuit of global domination.  Of course, anyone who knows anything whatsoever about actual communism, or who has read the actual words of historic communist leaders, would know and understand the ignorance and idiocy of such a proposition.

---

Idiocy abounds, and is easily swallowed in many stubbornly ignorant quarters. Thus the dangerous upending of reality continues.  Among other things, the masses have been sold the idea that capitalism is "the American Way", and that it guarantees freedom and democracy—none of which are even remotely true.

---

Yet, this preposterous notion of communism as the creation of evil elites, has a history in right-wing discourse that goes all the way back to Marx himself and has been championed by many contemporary right-wing influencers such as Antony Sutton (in his 1974 book “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution”) and James Corbett who runs a popular libertarian podcast from Japan.  This easily debunked right-wing trope has gained impressive traction within libertarian circles and inevitably, when the topic comes up, Sutton is cited by the libertarian faithful, as an authoritative expert.

The genius behind this narrative is that once you convince someone that communism is a tool and weapon of the elites that they created, and which they utilize for their own nefarious purposes, it reinforces and panders to the massive anti-communist narratives that the Western ruling class has created and been accepted as gospel by many unsuspecting Americans, over the last hundred years.

But this narrative which is being sold to the "anti-woke" side of the culture war, of course contains a primary and indeed fatal contradiction:  On the one hand, the anti-woke are asked to accept the reality of a gargantuan “communist conspiracy” purportedly designed to undermine society in the hopes of eventually achieving a one world communist government, while they are also asked to accept the narrative about “communism being the ultimate evil” a notion which the same ruling class has turned into a virtual religion over the past several generations at least since the end of WWII.

Here is a question for the libertarian faithful who embrace this narrative: how do you square this circle?  From where does this “communist conspiracy” draw its strength?  If the communists have infiltrated all aspects of government, why did they turn anti-communism into a veritable religion?  If the elites —who demonstrably control the West's governments everywhere—are “communist” why is communism so demonized by the same power structures of the West?

---

Yea, these guys are psychopaths alright, but NOT Marxist psychopaths. Try capitalist psychos. Only massive ignorance and confusion permits this kind of fundamental error.

---

So this is where the narrative pivots and does its best to pander to the inculcated ignorance of its intended victims.  By redefining “communism” as, “everything that conservatives oppose”.  There is truly no limit to the “evils” that conservatives are happy to blame communism for.  A lecture from one of the narrative’s top proponents, James Lindsay, is entitled “Maoism With American Characteristics”.  In this lecture, Lindsay panders to American ignorance by claiming Mao was an agent of the elites and that American elites want to revisit the evils upon the American people that Mao visited upon the Chinese people.

Another insidious aspect of this anti-woke propaganda offensive aimed at those Christian conservatives that have most fully embraced the religion of anti-communism, is the demonization of the nation of China.  The obvious agenda here is to rally public support for a future hot war against China. But an obvious question begs to be answered: why are the communists, ostensibly in charge of the West, agitating for war against the communists that they created and installed in China?  Like why are our supposed communist elites that are alleged to be shoving their woke agenda down our throats, provoking, sanctioning, and doing their best to cripple the economy of their Chinese communist allies?  This is just mindless ignorance peddled to mindless people.

Everything stated above is a necessary background and preamble to the actual point I am hoping to sharpen with this essay.  If we forget about these brazen contradictions which ought to make every adult reject this spurious narrative in its entirety, we are left with a basic argument that goes something like this: “I am an anti-authoritarian and so I hate communism and China for their authoritarianism.  I believe in freedom, liberty, and volunteerism, so I simply can not abide by the communist agenda and I will oppose the great communist conspiracy that is attempting to control our lives just as it controls the lives of the Chinese people. (you know, with all their censorship, organ harvesting, human rights abuses, COVID tyranny, and their efforts to genocide the Uighurs and Taiwanese).

Notice again the schizophrenia.  These folks parrot the bullshit narratives about China, long disseminated by the Western Elite, while simultaneously blaming a “communist conspiracy” of the Western elite, for the woke agenda.

Ferocious anti-communism has been drilled relentlessly into the American mind for well over a century, in a truly totalitarian way, with the most outrageous lies coming at the public from every conceivable corner: politicians, media, religion, academia, charities, the military, civic institutions, and of course the business class. The witch-hunt has also included blacklisting and overt police repression.

The reality of course is that the culture wars are facilitated, managed, and manipulated by the ruling class, not because the capitalist-feudalist ruling class are “communist” but because they are “wealthy elites” who hate and fear working class unity that communists hope to inspire and work to achieve. After all, Communists are the ones who have observed and identified the nature of class struggle and they understand that the Western ruling class exists first and foremost for the benefit of the small wealthy elite minority. This elite, chiefly concentrated in the US, but spanning the globe, comprises not more than 0.0001% of the human race. This tiny minority is supported by another 10% comprising the military, the police, and the PMCs (professional/managerial types, plus an assortment of upper-middle class small business owners). This elite owns outright or controls no less than 80% of all existing private property, including all the main means of production and media (which controls the people's minds), and entire nations (with their public goods) by controlling the political machinery of almost all nations currently in the so-called "collective West", the bloc of nations at present engaged in a war of conquest against Russia, China, Iran and whosoever else might stand in the way of their obsessive desire to maintain global hegemony and unipolar supremacy. Think about those facts for a minute, and tell us how you can believe such disgusting reality can equate with these elites' constant refrain that they are vibrant democracies!?

Since the power structure serves only the small minority of obscenely rich plutocrats, banksters, oligarchs, and industrialists, by definition, the power structure views the masses as an exploitable enemy that must be pacified and divided through constant propaganda efforts, lest they demand actual democracy.

So, the people must be lied to about everything including the supposedly democratic nature of Western governance, as well as the true history of popular communist revolutions and the tremendous accomplishments these revolutions were able to achieve whenever they succeeded in taking political power.  Mao best illustrates this last point.  He was perhaps the single greatest humanitarian of all time, doing more good for more people than perhaps anyone else in the history of the known universe.  However, according to Western elites, Mao was the greatest mass murderer of all time.  Inevitably, far too many of the intended victims of elite propaganda honestly believe and fall for these lies. Ubiquitous repetition does the trick, and the West has mastered the art of disinformation.

Of course, the anti-woke crowd, in their schizophrenia, embrace the narrative of the Western elite and agree that Mao was the most prolific mass murderer of all time. Simultaneously however, they also believe that Mao was empowered by and used by the Western elite and that the Western Elite’s “woke agenda” is simply the Maoist blueprint, being used on the American public (listen to James Lindsay, he’ll tell ya).

---

---

So why and how are these ignorant conservatives and libertarians “moral degenerates” and what does this have to do with anything stated above?  Good question, as I am slowly getting there.  First off, it has to do with their prioritizing nonsense terms like “anti-authoritarianism”, and other meaningless slogans such as “individualism, anti-collectivism, freedom, liberty, and volunteerism” above any other rational consideration of reality, morality, or justice.

Ultimately, libertarianism is the anti-democratic ideology of the rich who want to make sure that democracy never threatens their obscenely disproportionate share of wealth, power, and privilege.  So they emphasize “freedom” from government and they want government to be so small and ineffectual that it is unable to be used by the majority to threaten their interests and privilege.  

The rich promote “individualism”, a formula for social atomization, because they fear the unity of the collective—the people united—and the conquest of political power by ordinary citizens. They know that the masses would likely use their political power to run the state in the interests of everyone instead of just in the interests of the rich.  The rich have always hated communism and everything it stands for because ultimately, communism stands for the interests of humanity and wants to prioritize humanity’s interests over the oppositional interests of the wealthy elite.  So, libertarian “freedom and liberty” means the freedom to stand aloof from humanity in a position of extreme privilege.  It means freedom from the state and freedom from responsibility and accountability to the collective.  It also means the “freedom” for the rich to exploit the poor.  From the perspective of the rich, this is a natural political position to take as it promotes their material interests.

But, for the working class moral degenerates that sit in the church and affirm the dishonest narratives spun by folks like James Lindsay, and who have been hoodwinked into promoting the anti-working class ideology of libertarianism (which is in opposition to their own material interests) they simply want the freedom and liberty to be ideologically selfish. They don’t enjoy the wealth, power, and privilege that the wealthy elite do, so they embrace “freedom and liberty” because they want the freedom and liberty to be unaccountable to the rest of humanity.  They want the freedom and liberty to not be responsible to reality.  They want the freedom and liberty to maintain their indoctrinated delusions without being held accountable by their fellow man.  They want the freedom and liberty to be selfish and to not want to put any effort into understanding reality or doing any sort of work that doesn’t, first and foremost, benefit their confused misperception of their own self-interest.

Sorry, this is the behavior, advocacy, and ideology of the morally degenerate.  Prioritizing selfish individualism over responsibility to your fellow man, is the natural materialist predilection of the rich.  Christ himself, as anyone can read in the New Testament, reviled the selfish, judging selfishness, self-centeredness, a fundamental offense against his teachings and God. But there is a special shame for working-class libertarians, who adopt the material interests of the class which they don’t even belong to, while they simultaneously pretend to oppose them. Morality is about the courage and sacrifice of struggle.  It is the struggle to be a better person and to work to make the people around you better.  Morality can not be abstracted from the effort to discern reality, to understand reality, and the struggle to improve reality.  Libertarianism is a morally degenerate ideology as it embodies a rejection of all of the above, or at least its subordination to the *right* to not be told what to do.  Absolute “freedom” (besides being technically impossible since humans are social animals), is immoral.  Freedom ought to be tempered with wisdom, love, responsibility, thoughtfulness, consideration, sacrifice, and struggle.  When freedom stands alone, it can quickly turn to tyranny.  Libertarianism is a morally bankrupt ideology built atop lies and the material interests of the wealthy and powerful."

*  (Also, my response to James Lindsay after spending three hours watching his lectures).

"Leaked NYTimes memo shows pro-genocide bias is even worse than we thought" by Kevin Barrett

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Click here to sign the People's Proclamation and send it to everyone you know.

Source: Kevin's Newsletter

TRUTH JIHAD RADIO Leaked NYTimes memo shows pro… 0:00 13:01 Leaked NYTimes memo shows pro-genocide bias is even worse than we thought Press TV interview featuring me and ex-US Army psy ops officer Scott Bennett KEVIN BARRETT APR 18   READ IN APP   Rumble link Bitchute link The Intercept reports: THE NEW YORK TIMES instructed journalists covering Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip to restrict the use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” and to “avoid” using the phrase “occupied territory” when describing Palestinian land, according to a copy of an internal memo obtained by The Intercept. The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases” and to steer clear of the term “refugee camps” to describe areas of Gaza historically settled by displaced Palestinians expelled from other parts of Palestine during previous Israeli–Arab wars. The areas are recognized by the United Nations as refugee camps and house hundreds of thousands of registered refugees. The New York Times’ management encouraged its staff to use the word “terrorists” (as opposed to “fighters” or “militants”) when referring to Palestinian military actions such as the October 7 al-Aqsa Storm raid, but never in reference to Israeli massacres of civilians. Like all other US mainstream outlets, the Times has “reserved terms like ‘slaughter,’ ‘massacre,’ and ‘horrific’ almost exclusively for (the handful of) Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians, rather than for (the vastly larger number of) Palestinian civilians killed in Israeli attacks.” This kind of bias has been reported for many years by IfAmericansKnew.org, which has cited studies showing that each Israeli death gets dozens or hundreds of times as much NYT coverage as each Palestinian death. In today’s woke environment, it’s socially acceptable to blame the Times’ biased coverage on “white racism.” According to the woke interpretation, the Times’ management is made up of whites who order their somewhat darker-skinned staff to side with the white Israeli settlers against the brown-skinned Palestinians. Reports of a rebellion by ethnically-diverse NYT staff against their rabidly pro-Israel white management have been circulating since October 7, and it is widely assumed that whoever has been leaking NYT secrets to The Intercept probably has Global South ancestry and non-lily-white skin. Though it’s OK to blame white racism for biased NYT coverage of Palestine, anybody who blames Jewish racism (i.e. anti-goyism) will quickly be labeled a racist themselves! This despite the fact that everyone knows that The New York Times has been a totally Jewish-controlled operation since its founding, and that its rabid bias in favor of the genocidal Jewish State has gotten more extreme over the years. Anyone who doubts that the Jews who run the NYT and the rest of mainstream media are deliberately skewing their coverage to protect their beloved Jewish State needs to read Jewish ex-NYT-journalist Philip Weiss’s “Do Jews Dominate in American Media? And So What If We Do?” Nobody is allowed to touch this third-rail topic in Western media. But Iranian media is another story. That’s why I try to make a point of mentioning it on Press TV interviews, including last night’s. Below is a rough transcript. Press TV News Review Joining us now for the program is Scott Bennett, former U.S.Army Psychological Warfare Officer from San Francisco, California, and Kevin Barrett, editor at Veterans Today joining us out is Sadia Morocco. Gentlemen, I'd like to welcome you both to the program here. Always a pleasure to check in with both of you. I guess I will start with you, Mr. Dr. Barrett there. Dr. Barrett, what are we to deduce when the Israeli regime needs this level of censorship to elicit some sense of legitimacy? Kevin Barrett: Well, they can't allow an honest debate with both sides represented because they immediately lose the debate. And they know this now, and they've always known this. Their domination of American media is the biggest reason why this Zionist entity was created in the first place and has managed to persist all of these years. That's their number one line of defense. The great Jewish-American former New York Times reporter Philip Weiss wrote an article headlined, Do Jews Dominate American Media and So What If We Do?, in which he described his career in mainstream media, including at the New York Times. Weiss pointed out that the majority of his bosses, important co-workers and the owners of the outfits had been Jewish, and asked, why does that matter? Well, the reason it matters is because the vast majority of these people feel that the American media is Israel's last line of defense. And so they are motivated to basically use the American media, which is dominated by this ethnic group with loyalty to a foreign state, as a propaganda apparatus for that foreign state. They've been doing it ever since 1948. And they're getting more and more desperate. But today, because of the woke movement, they have to hire multi-ethnic people. They can't just have nothing but Jews and white people at The New York Times. So they hire a few token Arabs and Muslims who are, of course, appalled at all of this. And they leak stuff to The Intercept. And then you get the Jewish management at The New York Times launching a racist witch hunt against the Arabs and the Muslims there. So the United States is a multi-ethnic nation that's quite fractious and perhaps falling apart. And I think that the Jewish Zionist control of the narrative is falling apart too, in part because the younger generation, including the younger generation of Jewish Americans, is starting to see through the propaganda and understand the horrific reality of this ongoing long-term genocide that's accelerated so much in the last six months in occupied Palestine. Thank you, Dr. Barrett. Scott, welcome to the program. Scott Bennett joining us from Northern California. Now, Scott, according to The Intercept, it said that major U.S. newspapers, not just the Wall Street Post or the New York Post, but major U.S. newspapers disproportionately emphasized Israeli deaths in this conflict, used emotive language to describe the killings of Israelis but not Palestinians, and offered lopsided coverage of anti-Semitic acts in the U.S. while largely ignoring anti-Muslim racism in the wake of October 7th. Scott, does it sound like the America that likes to advertise itself the way it has for hundreds of years? And why let this tiny Israeli regime, Scott, make you compromise all the freedoms your founding fathers fought for? Scott Bennett: A very eloquent way of stating the truth, indeed. And you're exactly right, as is Dr. Barrett, whom I always admire. It is a sickening and depressing thing to witness the mainstream media that is supposed to be the voice of truth and reason and presenting facts for aiding the American person to arrive at truth and a well-balanced opinion—that is what the media and the press and the written word and the freedom of speech was always designed for—and instead, we have fallen into a propaganda black hole where the black hearts of the Jewish Zionists are oppressively and tyrannically forcing this propaganda down the American media's throats and the American people's throats. And that's why the American media is falling apart. No one is really reading The New York Times anymore or The Washington Post. They're not listening to Fox News. They really have turned these media outlets off because they're propagandistic and people sense that. They are very busy with their soccer games or their children or their jobs, their in-laws or their football games. So the American people have kind of disconnected as a whole. But this Israeli genocide, this Israeli murder, this Israeli demonic obsession with destroying every Semitic-blooded person, which is the Palestinians…It is not the Jewish, Zionist, Ashkenazi, Khazarians that have infected Israel like plague. Their obvious hatred is turning off the vast majority of the American people and (especially) the American college students. And you see this in their widespread protests and gatherings and objections to this speech. But you're precisely right. When America loses its freedom of speech, it's become nothing less than a metallic robotic machine without any heart and soul. Thank you Scott. And Dr. Barrett, before before we actually kicked off this News Review…I’ve seen a lot CNN coverage and they have a bureau there in Tel Aviv. And I Googled “does CNN have to get approval from Israeli military censors? And here's what came up. It said, “like all foreign news organizations operating in Israel, CNN's Jerusalem Bureau is subject to the rules of the Israeli Defense Forces censor, which dictates subjects that are off limits for news organizations to cover and censors articles it deems unfit or unsafe to print. Dr. Barrett, with 130 journalists plus killed in Gaza and southern Lebanon since October 7th, many of them with their families inside their homes as they slept at night, has the regime achieved its objective to continue with its campaign of censorship, or is it losing it? Had there been a doubt for many people in the world as to what Israel stands for, and the level of barbarism it employs, while trying to maintain some level of legitimacy …Has that been foiled now since October 7th? I hate to mention the silver lining when nearly 34,000 Palestinians, including 10,000 women and 15,000 children, have been slaughtered. But is there a silver lining? Is Israel desperately losing this media war? Kevin Barrett: Yeah, they've taken off their masks and shown us the genocidal serial killers that they've always really been. And this war on journalists where they've killed 130 now—that doesn't surprise me. It was getting close to 100 last I checked a month or a few months ago. This deliberate murdering of journalists to terrorize and silence the others is not working. Though it's true that (at least) they can get away with it (thanks to biased media coverage). If the other side were doing that, just imagine how it would be giant front-page headlines in The New York Times and all the other U.S. mainstream outlets, day after day after day after day. But Palestinians don't target journalists. Only Israelis do. Why is that? Well, we're seeing that the Israelis are constantly committing barbaric acts of cruelty and extreme, over-the-top, shameless war crimes. And some of them are even filming themselves doing it. It's like they're proud of it. And I think they know they've lost the PR war. Or maybe they just don't care. I think there's some kind of a national psychosis that's always been latent and occasionally rising to the surface in Israel. But it's completely taken over the Israeli Jewish population since October 7. And the whole world can see this psychotic and murderous behavior, thanks to the social media. The fact is that censorship doesn't really work when you have the people, the genocide victims of Gaza, running around with their phones and filming everything. And ultimately, one way or another, many of them are going to get these images out. And so murdering journalists doesn't really help. It just adds to all of these acts of barbarism that the whole world is seeing. And it has decisively turned the younger generation against the Zionist entity here in the United States, where as early as November, polls showed that the majority of American 18 to 24-year-olds support the Palestinian armed resistance and want to end the Zionist settler colonial entity. That's quite shocking. And those people are going to be the majority in the future United States. The Zionist entity only survives because it's propped up by the United States. And these old Zionist crazies who run the media in the United States, who dominate the financial sector, who have all sorts of political power—they're on their way out. They're dinosaurs. And the Zionist entity, now that it has destroyed its reputation and any possibility of legitimacy with this blatant, over-the-top genocide since October 7th, really might as well fold up its tent now before it does its own cause even more damage. And so, yeah, I guess you could call that a silver lining. At least the truth has finally leaked out. Thank you, Dr. Barrett. And Scott, final thoughts with you. We have less than a minute left. And Scott, final thoughts with you. We have less than a minute left. Where would the Israeli regime, Scott, be today without this very thorough campaign of censorship, including getting so much help in this campaign from its friends in the West? Scott Bennett: It would either be burned out of the Middle East or it would be humbled to the degree of decent, respectable treatment of its neighbors. But instead, the Israeli Jewish Zionist regime has become, as Dr. Barrett said, a psychotic, raging madman that the world is now seeing, having taken off their masks. And it's almost like these Jewish Zionists are in a blood-crazed mania. With all their killing of children they're like the priests of Baal. And the Jews in America and indeed Israel and elsewhere have equal blame. If you stand with Zionist Israel you're standing with a genocide of women and children. And (awareness of) that is going to get them expelled from America and from Europe, I think very soon. As we've heard, these dinosaurs who run mainstream media have no power or legitimacy. The future belongs to more independent voices. I think you're going to see a violent backlash against Israel, the Zionists, and the Jews, unlike any other time of history, because they deserve it, unlike any other time of history, for murdering and dismembering and crippling children in the thousands with a devilish glee. They do not belong to the human race. They are the synagogue of Satan. They are the seed of evil. And you see that by their works. So I think the future belongs to an uprising of youngsters in America and elsewhere that are going to reject both the mainstream media and their Zionist puppets as they fall apart and most likely are collapsed as a state by their neighbors as they stand up to stop this genocide. All right, gentlemen, thank you both and stay safe both of you.