Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts

Sunday, July 30, 2023

"Talisman Sabre 2023: LARPing for War on China" by Workers League

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims. 

Click here to sign the People's Proclamation and send it to everyone you know.


Source: Red Fire

Talisman Sabre 2023: LARPing for War on China

talisman-sabre-2019

30-07-2023: Largely out of the gaze of the mainstream media, the 2023 version of the Talisman Sabre military exercises will take place across Australia from the 22nd of July to the 4th of August. These war games have been held biennially since 2005, but the current drills are the largest to have ever taken place. Taking part with the Australian armed forces will be more than 30 000 military personnel from 13 nations, with others attending as observers. Armed forces from Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada will take part – with military delegations from the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand attending as observers. For the first time, Germany will take an active part in the war games.[1] The simulated exercises will stretch across the states of New South Wales, Queensland, Northern Territory and Western Australia. In another first, the Pacific Ocean external Australian territory of Norfolk Island (situated midway between New Caledonia and New Zealand) will be a staging post for some of the military manoeuvres.

Rehearsal for war

It is an open secret that Talisman Sabre 2023 is in practice a live action role play (LARP) for war on Australia’s giant Pacific neighbour, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). This is not stated openly, but anyone can reasonably surmise that during the military exercises Norfolk Island will double as Taiwan, as part of the duplicitous attempt by Washington to break Taiwan away from mainland China – even if it means World War III. Talisman Sabre is officially aimed at improving “inter-operability” with the US military, meaning the Pentagon will lead the charge into conflict with the PRC, sooner or later, with other “partner” nations bringing up the rear. Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles baldly states that Talisman Sabre aims at a “stable Indo-Pacific through an upholding of the rules-based order”.[2] Needless to say, the “rules-based order” is a euphemism for US (United States of America) led imperialism, which makes its own rules and expects all other nations to follow them – even if they are not informed what the “rules” are supposed to be.

Washington and its quisling satraps are desperately attempting to resurrect the dominant role it held over the globe during the 20th century. Yet this is a forlorn hope, as the Western capitalist economies stumble over backfiring sanctions imposed on Russia as part of NATO’s proxy war via Ukraine. The sanctions have had little to no effect on the Russian economy but have rebounded especially against the countries of the EU (European Union), and to a lesser extent in the US itself. Yet the contrast of the West’s floundering economies vis-à-vis the enormous Chinese economy is striking. In the US, workers’ wages have not increased in real terms since 1973 – a period of 50 years.[3] In the PRC, on the other hand, average workers’ wages have tripled just in the last 10 years.[4] In fact, the wage increases in the PRC over the last fifteen years have lead to some Western corporations set up in China actually relocating back to the US and other lower wage countries.[5] Some of these Western firms had outsourced their production to the PRC in the 1990s to take advantage of the then lower wages, but have seen this “benefit” evaporate in the face of annual substantial wage rises.

Stark comparison

Today, the PRC’s economy is the world’s second largest, yet if taken on the basis of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP – the amount of goods and services that can be purchased for a given amount of money), China’s economy has been the world’s leader since 2014.[6] In terms of GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth today, the comparison between the PRC and the West is even more stark. Despite the nonsensical and harmful Covid lockdowns imposed on the economy for two years, China’s GDP growth is 5.5% for the first half of 2023.[7] During the same period, Australia’s GDP growth is a pathetic 0.2%[8], which is basically a recession. The US is faring slightly better, at 2%.[9] Yet the former European powerhouse economies are in negative growth, with Germany at minus 0.1 and the UK at minus 0.3.[10] Some say the economic outlook in Germany and the UK has never looked bleaker.

Working people in the West are also struggling with surging inflation. In Australia, even though the  current official inflation rate is down to 5.6%,[11] it has hovered around 7% over the last 12 months. The average inflation rate in the EU is 8%,[12] though in reality even higher. In the US, inflation has slowed to 3% in June, but this is down from a four decade high of 9.1% in June 2022.[13] Simultaneously, the inflation rate in the PRC at the end of June 2023 is….0.0% !![14] Over the last ten years, inflation did reach 4.5% in 2019, but other than that inflation in China has been lower than 2.5%, and usually in the 1% range. While the masses struggle and even some workers with full-time employment slide further into poverty in the West, cost of living pressures in the PRC, the world’s second largest country population wise (India is now slightly larger) – are more or less non-existent.

The PRC is not lacking for infrastructure either, in contrast to the West. Grabbing the headlines has been the PRC’s development of high-speed rail lines. The PRC already has more than 2500 high-speed rail trains in operation, which alone is more than the rest of the world combined.[15] While the PRC currently has 38 000 kilometres of high-speed rail lines, the state-owned China Railway Group has plans to double the length of this network by 2035.[16] By contrast the US has one train which reaches 150 miles per hour on a 16 mile segment of track in New Jersey, and a spate of projects in California, Texas and Nevada which have yet to get off the ground.[17] Meanwhile, the aging US rail network is plagued by derailments, which occur at the astonishing rate of around three per day.[18] Australia’s legacy of attempts to establish even one high speed rail line are the butt of ongoing jokes. The Australian federal government has spent around 150 million dollars on studies about the feasibility of high-speed rail over four decades,[19] yet not one kilometre of high-speed rail has been built, in a vast continent which desperately needs to ease road and domestic air travel congestion.

Cooperation, not war

What accounts for such clear-cut differences between the economic performance of the Western economies and the economy of the PRC ? It is evident that the PRC long ago abolished the capitalist mode of production, and therefore its economic activity is not primarily activated by the relentless pursuit of private profit for a numerically tiny elite. While private enterprise is certainly used on the Chinese mainland, it is subordinate to the gigantic state-owned enterprises which dominate manufacturing, scientific research and development, infrastructure building and maintenance, quantum computing, telecommunications and much more. Banking and finance is largely state-owned, and the land itself has been nationalised. These are the fruits of the epic socialist revolution during the mid part of the 20th century in China, in which hundreds of millions of workers and peasants rose up and overthrew landlords which had oppressed them for millennia, and European colonialist powers which had subjected them to a “century of humiliation”. Imperialism “lost” China at that point, and this hard-won independence is paying dividends for Chinese workers to this day.

US led imperialism cannot tolerate even the smallest rival (witness the bombing of the Nord Stream pipelines to prevent German economic cooperation with Russia), let alone a peer competitor – and certainly not one which has the ability to surpass it. From the moment the PRC was conceived in 1949, Washington has carried out wars, subversion, destablisation and attempted colour revolutions both within the PRC and in the countries which lie on its borders – with the ultimate aim of regime change in Beijing. The Korean War and the Vietnam War were the earliest attempts, which has been followed by decades of arming and funding (and often creating) “opposition” parties and movements in Myanmar, Thailand and Cambodia, to name a few. However, as long as Chinese workers experience vastly improved living standards, continually rising wages and the building of new infrastructure the People’s Republic of China will not and cannot be overthrown. Not by a long shot. Hence, the “need” of the imperialists for regime change via external means – a catastrophic world war.

Talisman Sabre 2023 is just one cog in the imperialist juggernaut aimed at the PRC. To be sure, while workers in China retain state power, they do not directly hold political power. This is exercised by a conservative and bureaucratic caste, which rigidly adheres to the twin Stalinist nostrums of “socialism in one country” and “peaceful coexistence”. While acknowledging the historical role of both Maoism and the Communist Party of China (CPC) what is required is a proletarian political revolution which establishes the democratic rule of workers’ councils, combined with workers’ revolutions in the capitalist West, to open the road to international socialism. Yet this political task is today subordinate to the unconditional military defence of the PRC against imperialism, in order to stave off the dire threat of a calamitous war which would cause incalculable damage and the loss of millions of innocent lives. The best method of avoiding such a cataclysm is for advanced workers to mould internationally linked vanguard parties based on authentic Trotskyism, i.e., genuine Marxism. A future of regional cooperation rather than conflict is possible once working people lay capitalism to rest.

WORKERS LEAGUE

Tuesday, May 23, 2023

"Labor and the Far Left help Nazis grow in Australia" by Lorraine Pratley

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims. 

Click here to sign the People's Proclamation and send it to everyone you know.


Source: Red Star

Labor and the Far Left help Nazis grow in Australia

Above: Nazis rally at Parliament House in Melbourne on May 13, 2023. Their banner reads “Living Space for Whites Stop Immigration”.

Labor and the Far Left help Nazis grow in Australia

By Lorraine Pratley

(This article was written by the above author for Real Left Australia)

Yesterday, Saturday 13 May, I witnessed the fracas between the fascist National Socialist Network, CARF (Campaign Against Racism and Fascism) and Victoria police. 

Just who are the groups involved? This is an explainer from a Real Left perspective. ‘Fascist’ gets thrown around a lot these days and this is understandable, given Western democratic freedoms are fast flowing down the toilet, but it probably isn’t a good idea to be too loose with our words. For the purposes of this article, fascist means virulent Left-hating.

Antifa – Before Donald Trump popularised the term ‘Antifa’, anti-fascist protests in Melbourne were understood to involve socialists and anarchists. Antifa is not an organisation as such, rather it’s a tradition representing the thread of anti-fascist resistance that began in 1920’s Italy. Post WWII, antifa would have died out if there were no more fascists. Ongoing economic and social crises however, have ensured fascists have lurked everywhere, waiting for their chance to rebuild, just look at Ukraine. To complicate matters, since the Left got smug, acquired Trump Derangement Syndrome, and declared everything anti-establishment as ‘far right’, these days you will find Antifa types counter-protesting all sorts of issues that aren’t far-right at all, like medical choice or women’s sex-based rights.

In Melbourne, CARF is the group that organises formal protests against fascists. It is comprised of three main groupings:

Socialist Alternative – the largest proportion of CARF, a far-left organisation. The largest of its kind in Australia, highly organised and somewhat politically coherent, it’s the street wing of the Covid left, built mostly through in-person meetings, street stalls, and protests. It is also synonymous with the Victorian Socialists political party. 

Periphery of Socialist Alternative – comprising former members and university campus contacts.

Anarchists, modelled on the European Black Bloc – young men who wear black, including black (non-Covid) face masks, with theoretically shallow politics. They tend to be testosterone-filled adventurers, primarily there to get into a punch-on with nazis, or, at the very least, pelt them with things.

National Socialist Network, NSN – these are real Nazis, of the swastika loving, sieg heiling, Hitler worshipping type (and, according to The Age newspaper, replete with yesterday’s chant of “no Jewish power”). They are in a nascent phase after cohering a small hardcore of politically worked out fascists. They never went away, they have just been driven underground every decade or so by determined campaigns of confrontational protesters.

A quick snapshot of what happened on the day: nazi’s arrived one hour early, presumably to take the coveted parliament steps for photo ops before police arrived. Victoria police, presumably under heavy political pressure for negotiating a brief space on the steps for the nazis on 18 March in return for their cooperation to leave, were having none of that and successfully forced them off the steps, proceeding to cordon off an area for them on the road, keeping distance between them and counter protesters. After much sieg heiling on one side and noisy chanting on the other side, the police escorted the nazis southwards on Spring Street, where they guarded them in the Fitzroy Gardens, ensuring that, when the nazis eventually left, there would be none of the altercations so highly desired by the Black Bloc. (the linked video also shows a brief altercation when police were manoeuvring to escort the nazis away from parliament: anarchists got close and appear to have hit leader, Sewell, with a water bottle where it really hurts.)

By January 2023, the NSN in Melbourne seemed to have cohered about 20 members by agitating on social media against unscientific lockdowns and other authoritarian measures carried out by the state in the name of Covid-19. Fascism, as a political solution to the rapid escalation in authoritarianism of the Australian state and the brutality of the ‘pandemic’ measures taken, was overwhelmingly rejected by the approximately 25% of Australians who didn’t believe the Covid nonsense, including the many hundreds of thousands who protested lockdowns and mandates. Yet, covert activity including meetings, camps and working out in gyms enabled figures like Tom Sewell to cohere a number of followers into a foundational group. The NSN is currently in its next phase of growth: to publicly present on the street in ‘uniform’ (not to be confused with the anarchists, they wear all black now too) and in formation, in a disciplined and organised manner (still working on the latter) to project an appealing community and sense of purpose for angry and resentful men (and I thought I spotted at least one woman). And they’re buff. 

Despite the best efforts of the, now nonsensical, ‘far left’ to help the Nazis grow, to move beyond the current phase, that is to outnumber the far left and carry out attacks on far left meetings and spaces, would require a deeper economic crisis in Australia, which is as yet unlikely, given projected moderately low unemployment, and the insatiable hunger for Australian commodities on the global market. Nevertheless, with the budget announcement this week, Labor has handed the NSN a recruitment gift by announcing expanded migration of 715,000 people over the next two years in the context of a severe housing crisis where the projected housing shortage is around 100,000 for the foreseeable future and the government has only committed to building 6000 social houses per year for 5 years, a drop in the ocean. This is what led the NSN to call an anti-immigration rally in front of Victorian state parliament on Saturday, to capitalise on the extreme distress of many renters in Australia, the brutalisation of homeowners by rising interest rates, and generations of young people who know they will never be able to afford to buy a home.

A worker-centred response to immigration must be to slow the intake to a trickle until the housing and infrastructure crisis is resolved. Massive resources need to be poured into home building to bring prices down and relieve soaring rents. This would involve a reduction in defence spending and Big Pharma subsidies, along with imposing fair taxes on the rich. Rent caps must be applied in cases of opportunistic price-gouging. Vacant homes must be made available for rent, especially given the global supply chain crisis caused by lockdowns continues to have an unavoidable impact on the rate of house and apartment construction. Make no mistake, the Australian capitalist class will not countenance a slowing of migration, they want to pick and choose their workers and will maintain a callous disregard for the extreme housing stress that high immigration will cause to citizens, residents and new migrants alike. In order to counter resistance from the rich, workers, unions and their lower-middle-class allies must organise a serious campaign for housing justice. These are realistic, human-centred demands, and they are not racist.

The NSN had one banner at their rally, which read “living space for whites, stop immigration”. Presented with an opportunity to counter racist non-solutions with sound left-wing solutions, what did the far left do? They called their snap counter protest and spent almost the entire time, chanting contextually meaningless slogans like “migrants are welcome, nazis are not“. [Other stock standard favourites are “sexist racist anti-queer, nazis are not welcome here“ and the childish gloat “you’ll always lose in Melbourne”].

The upshot of the day for different forces:

NSN – a clear victory – they have at least doubled in size, in terms of people prepared to march on the streets (from 20 on 18 Mar to perhaps 40 on 13 May). We will see more of them. The more they are counter protested in such a shallow, mindless way by anti-fascists, the more attractive they will appear to some with a deep hatred of corporate woke agendas.

Socialist Alternative – given they recruit through protests, they will presumably be pleased with this outcome. They also seem to be losing the mask mandate war, given only about 50% of the contingent wore Covid masks, indicating it may not be possible to hold out with that charade for too much longer. And don’t expect them to learn any lessons about crying wolf about the “far right“, referring to those with valid scientific scepticism of the pandemic to the campaign to protect children and defend women’s hard won sex-based rights, any time soon.

Black Bloc – despite no actual fisticuffs, pleased, including downing Sewell with a close-range projectile and slashing tires. Given the lack of opportunity for confrontation throughout the Covid years, when they obediently stayed home and supported pseudo-scientific authoritarianism from the state they purportedly want to smash…

Victoria police – comfortable. Once again managed to keep several protest groups separate on the whole. No mainstream media optics of nazis on the parliamentary steps.

Dan Andrews  – don’t expect him to take any responsibility for manufacturing a deeply polarised state with a mental health crisis.

Genuine antifascists – some legitimate concerns are warranted. Fascists are growing in Melbourne. Thanks to policies of the mainstream left and the infantile mob behaviour of the far left.

Women’s sex-based rights campaigners – vindicated. They have nothing to do with nazis and, accordingly, were not present at Parliament yesterday.

In finishing off, I’d like to address a genuine question from a member of the Freedom community. Aren’t we on the same side as the nazis on this specific issue of protecting children? It’s true, these nazis seem genuinely concerned about gender ideology, a predatory anti-science movement with the express purpose of confusing and grooming children for the medical industrial complex and, for the rest of us, legally enforced mass participation in a minority of men’s autogynephilic fetish and, in its darkest corners, for the normalisation of pedophilia. However, how concerned are nazis, really? They didn’t care about Muslim children in the 2000’s or the 2010’s. Nor did they care about Asian children in the 90’s. Whilst we might say the same thing about the One Nation party, they have read the room and abandoned overt racism in favour of right populist policies and, importantly, defence of free speech and medical choice. Nazis, on the other hand, as indicated on their latest banner, presumably do not care about non-white children at all. So, with the practical merger of the mainstream and far Lefts with corporations and the state on many important issues, it has become necessary to ally with right populist forces. However, it’s important to draw the line at nazis, whose policies are overwhelmingly negative and divisive and who, let’s not forget, are homophobic and want women in the home.

For left wing people, it’s one thing to dream of a world without borders, but it’s another thing entirely to chant simplistic slogans that don’t address the very real problems faced by ordinary people today.

https://t.me/RealLeftAustralia

Wednesday, November 23, 2022

"In Australia, Senator Gerard Rennick tears shreds off Brendan Murphy (Secretary of the Health Department) and Paul Kelly (CMO)" by Joel Smalley

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims. 

In Australia, Senator Gerard Rennick tears shreds off Brendan Murphy (Secretary of the Health Department) and Paul Kelly (CMO)

The public health officials claim to be acting on facts and evidence but forgot to bring any evidence with them to the hearing.

 
SAVE
▷  LISTEN
 
Brendan Murphy (Secretary of the Health Dept) and Paul Kelly (Chief Medical Officer), Australia

Apparently, “it’s not true” that public health Australia got it wrong when they said the vaccine stops transmission (before, but obviously not now) and that it still prevents severe illness and death.

Watch and listen for yourself!

The arrogance of Murphy and Kelly is a sight to behold as they make audacious claims based on “evidence” that they fail to produce to support their dogma.

I reckon Kelly must have edited this piece of the NSW Surveillance Report though, because it also makes the same audacious claims (my emphasis):


COVID-19 hospital admissions, intensive care unit admissions, and deaths

COVID-19 vaccines are very effective in preventing the severe impacts of infections with the virus. Over 95 per cent of people aged 16 and over in NSW have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, while more than 70 per cent of people eligible for their third dose have received it.

With such high vaccination coverage in the community, a high proportion of people admitted to hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 are now vaccinated with two or three doses.

However, people who are not vaccinated remain more likely to suffer severe COVID-19. Note that some people with COVID-19 who are admitted to hospital or ICU are admitted for conditions unrelated to their COVID-19 infection, and these admissions will not be prevented by vaccination.


But then again, Kelly claims to be a details guy who doesn’t just “read the extracts” like the Senator. Maybe he didn’t have a hand in the Report after all (even though he continues to parrot the same message) because the actual evidence, the actual “truth” is that there were no unvaccinated people hospitalised with COVID (out of 310) or admitted to ICU (out of 25) and 1 death (out of 24):

I don’t know about you but that doesn’t look like the “not vaccinated remain more likely to suffer severe COVID-19” to me.

It’s kind of ironic that those who arguments rely entirely on their “expertise” and “credentials” seem to be floundering way out of their depth when presented with the very basic evidence?Perhaps Murphy and Kelly should actually study the data before perpetuating the lie about the Safe and Effective™?

I know who I’d trust. Given that it’s a politician, that ought to speak volumes about Public “Health”!

But don’t worry, I’m sure they’ll take it all “on notice” and come back with the absolute truth on Thursday as promised. Still time to get your booster before that. You know it makes sense!


Source: Dead Man Talking

Disqus