Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.
Click here to sign the People's Proclamation and send it to everyone you know.
Source: The Forgotten Side of Medicine
The Downward Slide of America's Healthcare ApparatusDeborah Birx's disastrous tenure on the COVID-19 Task Force epitomizes the breakdown of our federal institutions.
I recently published a guest article discussing the evolution of pleas for COVID amnesty and Scott Atlas’s experience within the White House Coronavirus Task Force. I would highly encourage you to read it, as this article is the follow up to it. Pierre Kory’s Medical Musings When I first learned of the Midwestern Doctor who authors The Forgotten Side of Medicine Substack, I was drawn to their deep understanding both of medical history and medical propaganda. Soon after we connected, I requested a discussion of the recent plea for COVID-19 amnesty, a request that has evolved into a series… 3 days ago · 593 likes · 650 comments · Pierre Kory, MD, MPA Over the last two years, we have watched the public become progressively more upset with the COVID-19 response. I believe we have now reached the point the majority of the American population does not support what has been done and a significant portion of them have lost their trust within the medical system. In parallel to this increasing public rejection of the COVID narrative, the media which initially censored any claims dissenting from the narrative, has gradually been allowing dissent from it to enter the public discourse. I chose to highlight each sequential “apology” for the COVID response because of how well their successive publications illustrated the narrative collapsing in real time. When the previous one was released on 1/30/23, I stated that it still did not meet the bar for the apology the American public required, and predicted that the next admission we received would, by necessity, be much more candid. Simultaneously, I was curious to see if it would touch upon the elephant in the room, the mass deaths which have resulted from vaccination, but doubted we were there yet. Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and if you have, please also consider pledging to support my work When the most recent one came out this month, I was a bit surprised as to who authored it—Scott Atlas. Scott Atlas was a highly acclaimed neuroradiologist and health policy scholar who chose to dissent against the narrative and eventually, in July of 2020, ended up in the White House and then on Coronavirus Task Force. Atlas chronicled what he observed and the profound consequences of those events for the nation in a memoir. In my eyes, there are three things that really stood out about what happened during his time at the White House. The first is that a relatively unknown figure, Deborah Birx, essentially commandeered the entire task force and was somehow able to pressure everyone to follow her nonsensical COVID-19 policy. This is important because most people believe Anthony Fauci was responsible for the national COVID-19 response, but reality both Fauci and the CDC Director Robert Redfield simply enabled Birx to do her damage to the country (e.g., they agreed with everything she proposed). The second was how tightly the national media worked in concert with these three doctors to push forward the test and lockdown policy—to the point anytime Atlas began to gain any traction with the task force, someone would “leak” his proposed policy to the national media. A dramatic caricature of Atlas’s proposal would be presented to American public alongside insinuations Trump was forcing the task force to follow his unscientific agenda (e.g., a common theme was that countless lives were being sacrificed for the economy), and before long, the task force would cave and reinstate the Birx’s policies. The final one is that many of the things Atlas observed on the task force were quite frankly surreal. Everyone deferred to the expertise of Fauci, Birx and Redfield, to the point that frequently, no amount of facts or logic could sway them from following the policies put forth by these three doctors. In many cases, Atlas recounted instances that quite literally reminded me of scenes out of Idiocracy, particularly this one: I hold the perspective that the hysteria and complete debasement of science we saw throughout the pandemic did not arise from nowhere. Rather, it represented an acceleration in the gradual decline of our institutions we have witnessed over the past decade (and potentially longer depending on one looks at this question). A year ago Elon Musk brought attention to one of my favorite political cartoons (which many of us can relate to) by tweeting it out: One of the interesting things about this meme is how accurate it has been for depicting the rapid institutional decline in science. In the same period this meme unfolded, much of “science” has shifted from using the scientific method to adopt relatively agreeable positions, to allowing experts (who are often being paid off by corporations to espouse their narrative) to dictate what is and is not a permissible scientific position. When I put the article together, I realized this meme also encapsulates exactly what we saw happen throughout COVID-19. I personally believe this trend is a result of both the media (which shares the same corporate sponsors as the experts) pushing this ideology onto society and the scientific profession being cowed into submission to the point most of them will not oppose nonsensical narratives they know are wrong. Control of SocietyThroughout history, there has always been a small number of people seeking to rule over and exploit the masses for their own benefit. Maintaining this control however has always been challenging. A variety of strategies attempted throughout history to prevent the masses from standing up. The fundamental challenge each immoral ruler faces is having sufficient resources available to address those who will predictably resist the leader. For this reason, leaders throughout history have utilized a variety of tactics to control the population which are significantly more economical than maintaining a gigantic domestic police force or military. This for example was often done by making a harsh example out of political dissidents so others would be too scared to follow in the dissident’s footsteps or having a large social institution which naturally created societal compliance. When the age of enlightenment began in the 17th century, it became far more difficult for monarchs to continue to use the tools they had previously enslaved the masses with. In turn, Western culture gradually shifted towards a capitalistic democracy where our faith in society came down to three beliefs: By having these beliefs be shared by the entire society, the ruling class became able to effectively control the population, as (especially with the help of monopolies and propaganda) they can easily influence the political and economic process to suit their needs. Most importantly, unlike rulers of the past, this could be done without needing to fund a large standing army to enforce compliance. I have thought about it for a long time, I believe (in spite of its many shortcomings) the current system of governance we have, which revolves around those three beliefs (and a functional judicial system), represents the best option of governance available to our species and each member of society. The only alternative models I feel have merit (creating a society built around fostering the conscious evolution of each of its members or a benevolent dictatorship), have emerged periodically throughout history. Unfortunately these are by their nature extremely inconsistent (e.g., most dictators will not be both wise and benevolent, and the more idealistic societies often end up getting conquered by less compassionate outsiders). Economic FeudalismAs American history has the move forward, they control the upper class has been able to maintain over the lower class has diminished due: When I was younger, I was told that the solution developed by a globalist group (which predated the World Economic Forum) to address this “problem” was to instill a system of governance similar to that seen during during the feudal era. This model has become a primary lens I interpret the world through because so much of what it predicted has since come to pass throughout my lifetime. In an economic feudalism (discussed in detail here), the following conditions need to be met: •Worsening economic conditions that took away the freedom in independence people previously had to dissent from the system. As a result, Americans more and more were forced to work under corporate jobs which treated them badly, but the workers were often left with no option except to comply with their employer. Note: although it did not exist when this system was originally conceived, I believe artificial intelligence is also playing a central role in the shift towards economic feudalism. This is because AI is gradually eliminating many of the jobs people could previously ensure their financial independence with, and because it makes it possible to micromanage and monitor each citizen, something that was previously impossible because at no point in time was there ever be enough personnel available to perform this task. Essentially, the relationship between the government and corporations in many ways resembles the balancing act previously seen between a king and one of his generals or lords. The king needed to utilize them to fulfill his domestic and international policies (e.g., conquering neighboring lands or controlling his subjects) so he could not afford to handicap or lose the leaders of his armies, but simultaneously, the king needed to keep them on a tight enough leash that they would not rebel against him and they work could be directed towards enacting the king’s national policy. When Biden’s illegal mandates were enacted, most of the establishment supported them, and in the time leading up to them I frequently heard many extol the merits of “using economic incentives to enforce compliance with vital public health policies.” I could not help but notice that, like the lockdown fanatics, none of them (even those I asked many directly) could see any potential issues with their position. Many things could be sad about the sad state of affairs (e.g., why you cannot trust many people to appropriately exercise the power they have over you). I specifically wanted to highlight how it exemplifies the scenario sought by the proponents of economic feudalism, and why are you so important to structure your life in such a way that you do not become an economic serf. Economic ComplianceSadly, this problem is not unique to the general corporate workforce. In parallel to increasing wealth inequality (note: COVID-19 was the largest transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich in history) people in many other fields have also felt the pinch. No Misdeed Goes Unrewarded in WashingtonWhen Birx effectively directed the coronavirus task force, she demonstrated a profound degree of scientific ignorance and emotional immaturity that is so surreal I still have some difficulty believing it really happened. Because of the profound consequences we faced as a result of that malfeasance, I detailed this behavior throughout the previous article, however since there was so much of it, I could not cover everything. One of the things I find the most fascinating about Birx was that despite the fact she managed to upset almost everyone she worked with, and had some major skeletons in her closet, the media was incredibly supportive of her and her fanatical advocacy for the lockdown narrative. For example, compare this account from CNN to what Atlas showed actually occurred (my commentary is in italics):
I know it shouldn’t, but it still somewhat amazes me just how much they lie.
Note: Birx and Redfield, previously worked on the Army’s HIV vaccine project. Their project was plagued by manipulation of data, inappropriate statistical analyses, and falsified data presentation and publication in order to receive congressional funding and to get a faulty vaccine approved by the FDA meant for treating HIV patients. Birx and Redfield were eventually investigated by the Department of Defense for this misconduct (Birx vouched for Redfield to the military and likely saved his career by doing so). Neither was sanctioned for what happened, they were allowed to continue their careers in Washington and promoted through the bureaucracy, which eventually culminated in the debacle we witnessed decades later during COVID-19. Corruption within CDCBecause of the pressures economic feudalism and the continually proliferating corruption has placed on our country, many people who see things for what they are and want to do the right thing find themselves trapped within systems that force them to do many things they simply do not support. Throughout my medical training for example, quite a few doctors and administrators I worked under could tell we were on the same page. They in turn did what they could to allow me to explore unconventional subjects and I greatly owe them for going to bat for me when issues emerged. A few months ago (in response to their completely unjustifiable decision to add the COVID-19 vaccines to the childhood vaccine schedule), I wrote a detailed summary of the documented corruption within the CDC: The Forgotten Side of Medicine Many of you are understandably outraged at the CDC’s recent unanimous decision to add the COVID-19 vaccines to the pediatric schedule. The decision is completely indefensible, and will result in millions of children being forced to be vaccinated for no benefit and substantial risk. For those who have any doubts this will happen, Tucker Carlson eloquen… 5 months ago · 364 likes · 202 comments · A Midwestern Doctor When I researched the article, I learned that just like many other facets of our society, the degree of corruption within the CDC has steadily increased with time (e.g., prior to COVID-19, the CDC was already bought out by all the same parties that profited handsomely off the dysfunctional pandemic response). Similarly, long before COVID-19, many members of the CDC had grave concerns about the direction the agency was going in due to that corruption, but for fear of their jobs and reputations could not speak out publicly against what was happening (e.g., consider this letter submitted by CDC scientists in 2016). Sadly, as has been the case in many areas of society, the rot within the CDC metastasized during COVID-19. One of the strongest proofs for this assertion came from an investigation by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) a year ago.
Note: GAO investigators also found that leaders of these agencies denied any reportable issues had occurred, and when asked why they they did not have provisions in place for these issues to be reported, officials failed to provide an explanation. Not having a reporting system in place essentially prevents these complaints from ever being reported. This parallels the NIH repeatedly failing to require its employees to disclose their financial conflicts of interest despite being require to do so. Birx and the CDCBirx’s misconduct was so out of line that it eventually prompted an investigation by Science. This investigation looked into both her conduct throughout the pandemic, and her similar misconduct when she oversaw the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). I feel that investigation adds a very important dimension to this story, so if you have time to read it in full, please do. For those who do not, I will summarize it here as much of what is described perfectly mirrors what Atlas stated he observed Birx do throughout the pandemic. PEPFAR was created to slow the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa, and to provide antiretroviral medications to those with the disease. In 2014, Birx was appointed as the head of PEPFAR. Once there, she sought to make it more effective by eliminating inefficiencies and being as data driven as possible.
Note: Throughout COVID-19, Birx would constantly insist that she was "all about the data," but both demonstrated that she did not understand the data she was compiling and refused to look at any data which challenged her narrative. Because Birx made completely unreasonable demands for the African nations to follow (due to her fixation on the need for more data), and penalized them for failing to provide all of the data she requested, this inevitably invited fraud to occur:
One observation about her time at PEPFAR was particularly prescient for COVID-19:
Once Birx became the de-facto director of coronavirus task force, she committed herself to following her previous playbook:
After some thought, Birx decided that the existing system for hospitals to communicate their data to the CDC (the NHSN) which the CDC had worked for 15 years to create was the problem. This was because while it could provide most of the data Birx wanted (and it was possible for the rest to be reliably modeled), it could not provide all of it. More surprisingly, she was very vocal about these objections:
So on July 13, during a meeting where twenty COVID-19 experts had gathered to discuss the best way to gather key data for coordinating the pandemic response, Birx assigned her aide who chaired the meeting to deliver a bombshell to the group:
The idea that a private contractor in a very short period of time could create a better system than the one the CDC had worked on for over a decade demonstrated a profound lack of knowledge and capacity for leadership that was instantly apparent to those present:
The move to shut NHSN down for hospital COVID-19 data in July was protested by more than 100 public health and patient advocacy groups, along with numerous scientific and medical societies. However, the media did not choose to aggressively peruse this (which I suspect was due to its close collaboration with Birx).
Since TeleHealth was a disaster, Birx decided to draw upon her previous experience at PEPFAR:
Amazingly, despite the many issues with TeleTracking, its contract was continually renewed, and the CDC only recently switched back to using their original system when the final contract expired at the end of 2022. ConclusionOne of the lessons I have learned throughout life is that most people are not good leaders (or managers). So, not surprisingly, many unqualified people will end up occupying those positions (e.g., I’m sure you’ve all had a boss like that). Over the last decade, I have noted that there has been a general tendency for people in leadership roles to handle their job by seeking out data and basing their decisions off of the data they acquired. Frequently, in turn, I observe this appears to be occurring because they don't actually know what to do and they want to have a way to justify their actions that looks good to everyone else. This ends up being a major problem if that leader lacks critical thinking skills (which is often the case) and thus doesn't actually understand how to make sense of their data. While I have repeatedly observed this issue, I have never seen someone do it to the degree that Birx has throughout her career. This in turn touches upon a broader question; why on earth would someone like Birx allowed to advance so far through the government, and why could no one challenge her throughout her time on the task force? I would argue that her rise to power is simply a representation of corruption having entered our system and causing it to no longer follow the agreed-upon standards it was founded upon. One of my core moral values is a variant of the Golden Rule—treat others the way you would want to be treated and hold everyone to the same standards. This for example has shown me not to condone subpar behavior, even from friends I care about (I’ve learned the hard way how quickly minor transgressions can escalate if left unchecked and repeatedly seen how much people grow if they are held to a higher standard). Similarly, because of the Golden Rule, I often find myself advocating for people being mistreated whom I do not ideologically align with or even particularly like in the first place. Conversely, because of the pervasive political polarization in our society, we can frequently observe members of society (e.g., the “woke progressives”) encourage things being done to others they would not under any circumstances accept happening to them. The decline and increasing corruption throughout all of our societal institutions affects everyone, and the events of COVID-19 (which kicked this decay into overdrive) I believe may have been the push that makes it possible for the society to recognize the issues we are facing. Since this is something that transcends partisan distinctions, it is my sincere hope it will create the push for our dysfunctional institutions to begin rebuilding themselves. For those who are further interested in this subject, much more on its importance and Atlas’s proposals to address what happened were discussed in the previous article. Additionally Robert Malone wrote an excellent series on what can potentially be done to fix these issues within the Department of Health and Human Services (part one can be viewed here, part two here). |
No comments:
Post a Comment