"While everyone was distracted, they added the COVID injections to the childhood vaccine schedule" by Jessica Rose

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.  Click here to sign the People's Proclamation and send it to everyone you know. Source: Unacceptable Jessica While everyone was distracted, they added the COVID injections to the childhood vaccine schedule No more liability... JESSICA ROSE FEB 11   SAVE ▷  LISTEN   Please refer to my previous write-up on this subject matter, for information on the childhood vaccine schedule of the NHS. I wrote up another article on this subject but I have written so many, I literally can’t find it. Help me to find it? :) Well folks, ‘they’ voted to put these COVID-19 injections into your babies - including the modified mRNA versions - and what that means is that they are free from liability, exclusive of EUA status, forever. What that means is if your baby gets injured by these as yet experimental modified mRNA COVID shots - that your baby doesn’t need: AT ALL - then you are on your own with regard to the product manufacturers being responsible, on any level. This isn’t a new story, but it sure is going to be a story that more and more parents share if they do not say no to this insanity. You can read about this on the Gateway Pundit’s site: Jim Hoft published this article on February 10, 2023. THIS IS INSANITY. Insanity Unsoundness of mind or lack of the ability to understand that prevents someone from having the mental capacity required by law to enter into a particular relationship, status, or transaction or that releases someone from criminal or civil responsibility. According to the CDC, your 6-month-old baby needs these COVID modified mRNA injections. Below is just a screenshot of the a much longer list of shots that the CDC claim that your baby needs. Again, HEPB at birth? Isn’t that enough for a parent to say HELL NO to all of their ‘recommendations’? Figure 1: Screenshot from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html Again, this means that liability protection is now waived. No one is accountable. No one is going to help you if your baby gets injured or dies. In fact, more often than not, according to my research, if a baby dies of “SIDS”, the parents are incriminated by the ‘authorities’ called in to investigate. Imagine, you lose your baby due to ‘other’ circumstances, and get accused of killing them. What a tragic societal construct we live in. Listen, there’s not much more to say here than this: from my point of view, if my baby was born healthy, I would breast feed them yummy mummy’s milk to promote full-breadth immunity and then I would let them grow. I would never inject my baby with exogenous agents that potentially contain all sorts of contaminants and I would certainly never let them be injected at 6 months with an out-of-date product based on novel technologies for a virus that is not a threat to my baby, in the first place. These mRNA shots, once again, have lamentable safety profiles and were NOT safety tested in infants. There is NO WAY to predict long-term development outcomes and they plan to use the original shot which is far and beyond obsolete. Please talk about this with your friends. If millions of adults are reporting adverse events - from neurological to cardiovascular issues to death - in temporal proximity to getting these shots, then how in the hell are babies going to fare? They are new. They need time to develop as nature designed without exogenous injected agents. There are 3,610 adverse event reports in VAERS as of February 10, 2023, not including the under reporting factor. Again, it should be taken into account that babies this young have not been ‘authorized’ to be injected with these products for very long. Figure 2: VAERS reports of adverse events for babies ages 0-4. It might be good news that the number one reported adverse event in the 0-4 years of age category for the COVID shots is “Expired product administered”. Please, assess by intuition and heart whether or not the following chart makes any sense. Figure 3: Extracted from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/easy-to-read/child-easyread.html https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/downloads/parent-ver-sch-0-6yrs.pdf And here is the pre-planned ‘Future Product’ dosing information for babies ages 0-4 years of age. Figure 4: Extracted from Updated 6/2/22 Updated CDC Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccination Operational Planning Guide — Information for the COVID-19 Vaccine for Children 6 Months through 4 Years Old and/or COVID-19 Vaccine for Children 6 Months through 5 Years Old https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Pfizer-Pediatric-Reference-Planning.pdf As a final point, at the recent joint hearing of the Health Subcommittee and the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee regarding the federal response to COVID-19, Walensky testified the following: “I think that we need to recognize [that] the reason that ACIP recommended and CDC put forward getting the COVID-19 vaccine on the pediatric schedule, it was the only way it could be covered in our Vaccines for Children program. It was the only way that our uninsured children would be able to have access to the vaccines. That was the reason to put it on the schedule. It can’t be eligible for the Vaccines for Children’s program to be available to the underinsured unless it is on that schedule. That was the reason to put it there. Thank you for allowing me to correct that,” said Walensky. Eh. Wrong. As Jim Hoft correctly states in his article in the Gateway Pundit, “Walensky lied under oath. The Vaccines For Children (VFC) and Childhood Immunization Schedule are two distinct programs.”