These dirty termites just want to kill you because they are Deep Insiders in Terms of the Government and Rand Corporation Think Tank Public Health Economic murderers.
They just need to kill you softly.
So it doesn’t look like…uhh…like a kill.
Jay Bhattacharya: Yeah, so COVID vaccines in particular are extremely effective at protecting against severe disease.
Peter Robinson: All right, so briefly, what would you say to someone who's still... Honestly, there may be viewers who won't take it from Anthony Fauci, but might take it from Jay Bhattacharya. What would you say to someone who still hasn't gotten vaccinated?
Jay Bhattacharya: I mean, you think that for someone who's older, especially, the vaccine is incredibly important. COVID is very deadly disease as we talked about for people who's older. And the vaccine, while we haven't... It's only been in human use for 10 months, right? So we don't know all of the side effects, but we've seen enough to know it's pretty safe.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, October 13, 2021
Hoover Institute interview
Here is Useful Idiot comedian Jimmy Dore, per usual, completely missing the fucking point.
This is what I meant about Dr. Jay Bhattacharya being pre-selected to be a *dissident* on Lockdowns Bad.
See Lockdowns were scripted in 2010 in Lock Step, a Rockefeller Foundation Scenario Exercise for a Global Pandemic which they were planning to stage.
The Show Runners knew that locking down the useless eaters would piss them off and wrote in some Pacification and Control Lockdown Bad Dissidents (::wink-wink::) and Lockdown Sceptics and Great Barrington Declaration and Planet Lockdown heroes and info-warriors to warn you about “Mr. Global”.
Then they trotted them out on the Tier Two Dissident media designed to frame your understandings and bamboozle you and pay no attention to the fact that your Heroes wanted you to GET THE FUCKING SHOTS IN YOUR FUCKING ARMS.
Meanwhile Lockdowns Bad dude just PUSHED THE FUCK OUT OF THOSE FUCKING DEATH SHOTS TO THE ELDERLY.
(:27)
Here is comedian Jimmy Dore rolling out Bob Malone promoting killing more elderly.
He’s going to the Vatican!
To promote the Death Shots for the vulnerable and the elderly!
Exciting!
Do you think that there are some powerful people that meeebbeeeeee wanted some shots in some elderly arms?
You know under the agreed upon pretext of “saving them” from the ALLEGED ROGUE VERY DANGEROUS KORONAVIRUS.
As public health policy.
(:42)
Of course ROBERT MALONE always there like Kovid Gump would furrow his brow and go very jabs bad when as many shots were in as possible.
Here is some of the scrubbed Global Covid Summit version of Robert Malone now deeply concerned about the rushed vaccines. He is talking about for the kids but I wonder if he still wanted the elderly to get shot up.
But probably by December, 2021, those stubborn olds who said “awwww hellllnawwwww” were not going to flip then.
See these dirty termite Deep Insiders in Terms of the Government will say whatever whenever and your jackass comedian boys and BTC Roundtable groups will provide the appropriate venue at the appropriate time for the breathless updates on their sudden remembrance of *The Science*.
(3:08)
(:25)
“…mistakes have been made.”
Soooorrrryyyyyyyy about the mistakes, y’all!
Jay Bhattacharya is a Rand Corporation Stanford Public Health Bean Counter.
Bean Counter Jay has long known that the public health burden on his Wealthy Bosses would become untenable.
I am perhaps the only critter on Planet Murder the World who has tracked Jay Bhattacharya back to this study and used the helpful information that Catherine Austin Rockefeller Fitts provided to tie the room together like An American Vagabond Rug.
It’s nothing personal.
They hate everybody, but it’s the elderly who are especially expensive.
Spookipedia says:
Medicare is a federal health insurance program in the United States for people age 65 or older and younger people with disabilities, including those with end stage renal disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig's disease). It started in 1965 under the Social Security Administration and is now administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
Medicare is divided into four parts: A, B, C and D. Part A covers hospital, skilled nursing, and hospice services. Part B covers outpatient services. Part D covers self-administered prescription drugs. Part C is an alternative that allows patients to choose private plans with different benefit structures that provide the same services as Parts A and B, usually with additional benefits.
In 2022, Medicare provided health insurance for 65.0 million individuals—more than 57 million people aged 65 and older and about 8 million younger people.[1] According to annual Medicare Trustees reports and research by Congress' MedPAC group, Medicare covers about half of healthcare expenses of those enrolled.[2] Enrollees cover most of the remaining costs by taking additional private insurance (medi-gap insurance), by enrolling in a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, or by joining a private Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) plan. In 2022, spending by the Medicare Trustees topped $900 billion per the Trustees report Table II.B.1, of which $423 billion came from the U.S. Treasury and the rest primarily from the Part A Trust Fund (which is funded by payroll taxes) and premiums paid by beneficiaries. Households that retired in 2013 paid only 13 to 41 percent of the benefit dollars they are expected to receive.[3][4]
Manhattan Institute says. (promo code Shilhavy)
May 30th, 202310 Minute ReadReport by Chris PopeShare
Download PDF
Keeping Medicare Affordable: The Cost of Adding Services
Executive Summary
Medicare spending on new procedures is the single factor most responsible for the projected surge in the national debt over the coming decades. This report outlines a path to averting this fiscal explosion without cutting existing benefits or hindering valuable medical innovation.
The federal government now spends more on Medicare every year than it does on national defense, and the cost of the program is expected to double over the coming decade. Following reforms over recent years, per-beneficiary Medicare spending on long-established medical procedures is now growing at little more than the general rate of inflation. By law, adjustments to Medicare fees for existing billing codes cannot increase the program’s overall cost; but there is no such constraint on the addition of new codes. Expansions of coverage are made almost entirely without consideration of (or even efforts to quantify) the additional costs to taxpayers. As a result, increases in the program’s expenditures are largely due to increased spending on new services and billing codes.
Projected economic growth will likely be sufficient to fund the current level of benefits for existing Medicare beneficiaries, as well as for those projected to retire in the coming decades. But it will not cover an open-ended commitment to pay for whatever new medical services are developed, regardless of their cost-effectiveness. To keep Medicare’s cost to a sustainable level, it is necessary to slow the addition of new procedures to the program’s basic benefits package.
To restrain the proliferation of low-value services, Congress should be required to approve expansions of Medicare’s fee schedules before they take effect. This would provide scrutiny of their additional value, relative to other budgetary priorities. Medicare Advantage can also provide additional resources to cover cost-effective services that await addition to the basic benefits package.
Medicare’s Cost Challenge
The cost of Medicare has increased steadily since the program was established in 1965 and is projected to continue growing.
In 2020, federal spending on Medicare for the first time exceeded that on national defense.[1] The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that in 2032, Medicare will spend $1.9 trillion—twice the level of expenditure on defense.[2] Medicare’s trustees note that the program’s cost has risen from 2.2% of GDP in 2000 to 3.9% in 2021, and they estimate that it will exceed 6.0% in 2040 (Figure 1).[3]
Such an increase in expenditure is unsustainable. According to CBO, the anticipated increase in Medicare spending will account for three-quarters of the 3.9% increase in the federal budget’s primary deficit (i.e., excluding interest payments) from 2022 to 2050.[4] Without reforms to Medicare, increases in tax rates, or cuts to other programs, interest payments on the federal debt will soar from 1.6% to 6.7% of GDP (Figure 2).[5] Beyond 2058, projected deficits “become so large and unsustainable that CBO’s model cannot calculate their effects.”[6]
Everybody has a right to live only so long. The old are no longer useful. They become a burden. You should be ready to accept death. Most people are. An arbitrary age limit could be established. After all, you have a right to only so many steak dinners, so many orgasms, and so many good pleasures in life. And after you have had enough of them and you're no longer productive, working, and contributing, then you should be ready to step aside for the next generation.
Sooorrrryyyyyyyyyy.
Many mistakes have been made. 
There you go.
We had this two and a half years ago, but look at them go.
They can’t stop now.
Nothing personal.
They just need you fucking dead.
Some of you I think are okay with that as long as your para-social relationship with your Goody remains intact.
Fine.
I’ll be the asshole and raise my hand slowly and point out the uncomfortable reality of the cull.
No comments:
Post a Comment