Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.
Source: The Unz Review
China describes its economy as “socialism with Chinese characteristics.” Given China’s pivotal role in global capitalism, I believe it’s fair to classify the current expression of “Chinese socialism” as a hybrid system. I’d go even further to say that the capitalist component is integral enough to China’s economic model that “capitalism with Chinese characteristics” also makes sense. So is China socialist? Capitalist? Both? Neither?
China’s governing political party is called the Communist Party of China (CPC). However, I don’t think one needs to be a professor of economics to realize that China doesn’t practice Marxist communism.
So why does China retain the communist label?
Respect.
Respect for whom?
Respect for the brave men and women who delivered China from Jewish-Anglo-European-Japanese exploitation and the Century of Humiliation. Respecting the sacrifices made by elders and ancestors runs deep in Chinese culture.
Whether China keeps the communist label in perpetuity, or retires it after a respectful timeframe for something that more accurately reflects its real-world model is an internal Chinese matter, and not my place to comment on.
I view capitalism as China’s dominant economic production mechanism. I view socialism as China’s dominant economic control mechanism. Like a motor with a control switch. Put simply, the state dominates the corporation and bank.
Components of traditional public-welfare socialism also exist within China, e.g., socialized medicine, free college, nationalized banks.
The big difference between “Wall Street capitalism” and “socialism with Chinese characteristics” is that the latter has the capacity for intelligent adaptation and positive evolution, while the former is impervious to reform and can only grow more predatory, corrupt, and violent.
In the US, the corporation and bank dominate the state, or to take it one step further, the state is the corporation and bank- and the Zionist Lobby. This makes for an “interesting times” economic hybrid. A fusion of neoliberal capitalism, corporate socialism, techno-police statism, and Jewish* supremacism. I call it ‘ZioCorp.’ (*No offense to non-involved Jews. For the record, I identify as a Jewish Hebrew Israelite who follows the Tao.)
The corporation’s goal is profit, not social well-being. Inflated medical bills enrich hospital corporations and shareholders, but send millions of Americans into bankruptcy. In China, the state owns the hospitals. Whether tricking the body’s immune system to attack cancer cells or using robots, 3D printers, and bone cell regeneration for quick and easy dental implants, Chinese socialized medicine has far surpassed American for-profit medicine.
“For the love of money is the root of all evil,” says the Bible verse, and neoliberal capitalism has fast-tracked humanity to ‘peak evil,’ with some benefit to China. Wisely, China took advantage of Wall Street’s financialization and industry outsourcing scheme. However, now Shylock wants his pound of filet mignon, i.e., China’s economic engine. Or it’s war.
From my observation, in this phase of “socialism with Chinese characteristics,” China uses capitalism to expand its middle class demographic as well as fund a strong PLA. A major reason President Franklin Roosevelt steered the US into WW2 was to end the Great Depression. Global finance may decide that WW3 is the only way out of the Wall Street Ponzi scheme.
America’s predatory techno-financialization can’t match China’s real-value domestic development and foreign BRI network. To compete with China, the US Anglo-Zionist Empire and its vassals engage in thug adventurism, such as illegally driving Huawei out of markets and kidnapping its amazing CFO, as well as orchestrating terror attacks and color revolutions on Chinese soil. Imagine the US outcry if China arrested the CEO of Verizon or funded and armed California, Texas, or New York secessionist groups.
Any discussion of China’s economic policies needs to factor in the existential threat posed by the Pentagon/IDF/NATO/Asian-vassal military alliance. However, given the fluid nature of the conflict, I’m excluding hot-war conjecture from this article, as that adds another multitude of variables. My brief comment on that potential battlefront is that if weather conditions permit, I think China should work to bolster the China-Russia-Iran Triad Alliance for as long as Zio-America remains a threat. It is harder to break three sticks bound together than a single stick, and three sticks carry more weight than one. Conversely, if radar detects unique weather patterns, then action through inaction could be the best move, e.g., PLA super-AI predicts imminent US collapse.
That said, my main concern for China is not the US-Zio military threat, for if the Dragon ever spreads its terrifying war-wings, its enemies will shake like a seizure patient with hypothermia. From my viewpoint, the immediate danger comes from “Western” global finance infiltration.
The current US cold war against China can be boiled down to three words- “Let us in.”
From my observation, to the degree in which China agrees to international banker interference is a matter of black-box debate within China’s inner circle. A quiet discussion reverberating across the solar system.
Even the wisest emperor relies on the council of his court. May The PLA Commander’s voice reach the necessary decibel. “Interesting times” calls for the intelligent warrior who transcends fear and attachment to shiny toys and pallets of cash.
The stakes of the game are high- not just for China, but for the entire planet. If used in conjunction with win-win philosophy, China’s advancements in AI, cold fusion energy, and other technologies could lead humanity to post-scarcity Kardashev Level I Civilization. For this to occur, China must protect its national borders, culture, and DNA from hyper-capitalization while simultaneously playing the capitalist game and 3D international chess. Easier to pet a wild tiger. Yet not impossible.
China studied the former Soviet Union to avoid the pitfalls of Marxism; China needs to study the United States to avoid the pitfalls of hyper-capitalism.
For that lesson, I incorporate the US historical period of 1945 to the present. While many cultural and circumstantial differences exist between this segment of American history and the China of today, that US epoch provides useful data, particularly in regard to the recent rise of China’s middle class and role as global manufacturing powerhouse.
In an astounding rise and fall story, 1945 to 1965 witnessed the unprecedented growth of the US middle class and manufacturing sector, while 1965 to the present saw an equal or even more dramatic decline in both arenas.
Historically, US upward mobility has been exaggerated. While examples exist of men rising from poverty to amass great fortunes, most who lived on the farm died on the farm- or factory. Or went bankrupt from “get-rich-quick” schemes. Contrary to popular myth, and without even including the Native Red and Black experience, the US was not founded as an egalitarian society. As Trotskyite turned neoconservative Prof. Seymour Martin Lipset noted in his book “Revolution and Counter-Revolution,” all cabinet appointments from George Washington to Andrew Jackson came from the top-tier wealth class. The massacres of striking workers by Pinkerton detectives and the police give some insight into the horrendous working conditions experienced by much of the late 19th /early 20th-century US labor force.
It wasn’t until after WW2 that America achieved middle class demographic dominance. With Europe in ruins, the US became the global manufacturer. “Made in the USA” was today’s “Made in China.” With higher salaries came mass consumption and consumerism.
While it took until the early 1950s for the US public to feel the effects of the economic boom, I use 1945 as the benchmark date, as that’s when America took over the role of global hegemon from Great Britain, accelerating middle class growth.
The 1945 -1965 middle class miracle seemed to herald capitalism’s triumph. The GI Bill, which offered free higher education to WW2 veterans, contributed to the American success story. Banking rules like Glass-Steagall, anti-monopoly regulations, and capital gains tax kept wealth inequality from reaching robber baron levels. Compare salary differences between a 1955 CEO and his employees and a 2025 CEO and his/her employees.
For the most part, order was maintained through an Edward Bernays “manufactured consent” medley of consumerism, anti-communism, patriotism, and “Christian-capitalism.” This relatively benign control system worked while the interests of the oligarchy and general population briefly aligned.
I don’t want to present this era as a panacea. During this time, 20% of the country remained in poverty, with rural Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Red Indians hardest hit. Blacks suffered additional pressures under harsh racial control mechanisms.
The US also engaged in anti-freedom activities abroad- Operation Gladio, Operation Ajax, and the United Fruit Company coup, to name a few. This was the era that birthed the permanent CIA security state and Military Industrial Complex that President Eisenhower warned about in his farewell address. The “Red Scare” was used to remove socialists from labor union leadership and replace them with a capitalist-friendly Mafia as well as set the stage for the unnecessary and wasteful Cold War, Korean War, and Vietnam War.
Despite these negatives, the 1945-1965 US middle class grew at an amazing rate.
While perhaps not an exact benchmark, 1965 heralded the end of the middle class miracle, although it took around five years to notice. 1965 represented full force entry into Vietnam, which ballooned debt and kicked off early 1970s inflation.
Replacement of White Anglo Saxon gatekeepers in media, business, think tanks, universities, and finance by Jews took off in or around 1965, paving the way for the current US Judeo-Zionist oligarchy. The “Holocaust Industry” narrative also helped.
1965 marked the non-European mass-migration Hart-Cellar Act, which like the post-US Civil War “Northern Industrialist-Great Britain/Rothschild” engineered Irish, Southern and Eastern European mass-migrations, raised rents and lowered wages for legacy Americans, who in the latter 19th / early 20th century were majority Anglo-Saxon. Black, Native Red Indian, and Mexican legacy Americans of that time lived under a somewhat different power dynamic, which is too data-heavy to get into for this article.
Present-day engineered Global South mass-migration to the United States (and UK/Europe) not only benefits the rentier class and corporations, but also serves as a control tool for the nouveau Jewish-Zionist oligarchy. However, this strategy has created domestic pro-Palestinian/ anti-Israeli blowback for US-UK-Euro Zionists, which explains why all the well-funded Western anti-immigration parties are pro-Zionist (and neoliberal capitalist).
I don’t blame immigrants for engineered mass-migration, as most escaped conditions created by US foreign policy. “Yankee go home,” as they used to say. Nor do I implicate non-involved Jews in Zionist Lobby problem-solution mass-migration engineering.
As per the Powell Memo, by 1971, the oligarchy concluded that the “democracy experiment” was over. The oligarchs and corporate interests wanted all the money, and the large anti-Vietnam War protests and counterculture movements demonstrated that “manufactured consent” was unreliable. It’s likely that this was the time when the decision to outsource US manufacturing to China was made, which corresponds with Nixon/Kissinger-CPC rapprochement.
Unregulated oligarchy arrived in 1980 via a movie actor turned President, patriotic jingoism, Milton Friedman “trickle-down / free market” promises, and the Christian-Zionist Evangelical movement. Notice how much propaganda Make America Great Again borrowed from Ronald Reagan, including the slogan. Perhaps it’s no coincidence that Reagan and Trump were media celebrities before politics. Upward wealth transfer at the expense of social safety nets and hard-won labor rights is a hard sell to the working class, but “Reagan Democrats” and the MAGA crowd bought it.
Corporate-banking deregulation, social safety net cuts, and outsourcing of manufacturing to China continued at warp speed under Bill Clinton, while the American public remained transfixed on Clinton’s Mossad-honeytrap indiscretions.
September 11, 2001, marked the official end of the American republic or what remained of it. Granted, America was always an oligarchic republic with some democratic checks and balances, and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 stripped America of its economic sovereignty, but now it was truly over.
Following the Mossad/US Deep State-orchestrated 9/11 attacks, the police state, endless war, corruption, torture, psyops, and looting ramped up with no internal safeguards left to resist the onslaught. The “Greater Israel Project” became a key component of US foreign policy, as Jewish Zionists held the dominant faction within the US oligarchy.
So here we are.
What lessons can China learn from the post WW2-present US epoch?
1- Beware of Corruption.
Corruption destroys all economic systems, regardless of ideology.
In the US, draconian laws and panopticon surveillance keep the people in check while the donor class runs wild. Criticize genocide, go to jail. Steal pensions, become Secretary of the Treasury. As the Tao Te Ching says: “The more rules and regulations are set, the more we find the rats eating the grain.”
I applaud China’s top-down anti-corruption policies. “The fish rots from the head down,” as they say. When a corrupt banker or politician is punished, it sends the correct message to the people. Future CPC leaders (and citizens in general) should be inculcated from day one to hate corruption like a farmer hates locusts. Locusts strip the field, corruption strips the nation.
2- Beware of hyper-capitalism and its 3 daughters.
Hyper-capitalism puts profits before everything- including people, culture, nation, and ecology.
Hyper-capitalism creates crooked stock market casinos, currency speculation scams, built-in booms and busts, and all the rest of it. Connected insiders turn money into more money with no value production, leading to a usury-based parasite-run society.
Marx’s theoretical shortcomings notwithstanding, he predicted end-stage capitalism with great accuracy. However, he failed to realize that it wasn’t a socialist worker’s paradise that would replace Western capitalism, but rather neo-feudal technocracy.
While Western capitalism is too ossified and corrupt to transform into anything that benefits humanity, “socialism with Chinese characteristics” has demonstrated the capacity for positive evolution. To maintain this chi, guard against hyper-capitalism’s three daughters.
Hyper-capitalism’s first daughter is materialism.
Materialism is a necessary quadrant of the yin-yang circle. We live in a physical world with physical bodies. The belly wants rice. “When bellies rumble, nations tumble,” as they say. Materialism via technology feeds many. On a more fundamental level, when the physical world crashes, the body follows.
Material martial advantage is crucial on a resource-war planet. Flintlocks trump wooden clubs and space lasers trump flintlocks. However, at some point, everyone’s dead.
When society fills its entire yin-yang circle with materialism, it creates imbalance. This results in ignorance of the flows and blockages contained within natural and technological systems.
It is this form of materialist imbalance that I’m focusing on, but I will simply call it “materialism.”
Technocracy is a negative socio-evolutionary expression of technological materialism.
Technocracy places man’s intelligence over Cosmic Intelligence. Nature (Cosmic Intelligence) created man, not the other way around. If man in his arrogance seeks to upend rather than follow the natural order (flow), he will suffer his Fermi Paradox techno-fate.
While touted as a “rationalist,” the materialist technocrat is often the craziest person in the room, as demonstrated by the Tuskegee Study, Bikini Atoll paradise nuking, MKUltra, San Francisco-NYC subway biowarfare experiments, and Dr. Anthony Fauci.
The more technologically advanced the society, the more the need for tai chi, kung fu, gardening, archery, playing a musical instrument, or writing poetry.
Materialism is not exclusive to hyper-capitalism. Marxism is materialist, albeit in a different way. If Marxism worked, China would still practice it. Like milk, Marxism and hyper-capitalism turn sour when left out too long.
Most great socialist thinkers who came out of the 1848 European revolutions disliked Marx and Marxism. The international bankers pushed Marxism as the bad option to predatory capitalism and to discredit socialism. Obviously, Chairman Mao made the correct choice with Marxism. If he chose predatory capitalism, China would now be under Anglo-Zionist military occupation like South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines. However, with all due respect to Chairman Mao, I see no evidence that China currently practices Marxist economics.
Hyper-capitalist materialism turns the citizen into a consumer. What happens to the nation whose men receive their highest pleasure from the newest line of sparkly offering? It turns metrosexual.
While the metrosexual is easy to control and is often competent in his circle of technical expertise, his empty consumerism makes him vapid, depressed, and feminized, which leads to blocked chi, which on a collective level, leads to loss of national vitality. Mass SSRI prescribing only makes things worse.
The female counterpart to the metrosexual is the neurotic (usually childless) career woman. This type constitutes a sizable portion of young Western professional class females.
Man is an abstract thinker who cognates beyond the material. Consideration must be made for a “spiritual outlet.” Otherwise, you end up with Falun Gong blowback. While Western science rejects the “spiritual,” I think China should recruit neuro-biologists and theoretical physicists to study “consciousness,” which followers of Tao consider present in all matter in the universe, albeit at different concentrations. Breakthroughs in this realm could save humanity from the Fermi Paradox techno-deathtrap.
To technologically advance and remain human- reinterpret the myths, symbols, and archetypes. Don’t destroy them.
The second daughter of hyper-capitalism is gross wealth inequality.
Gross wealth inequality destabilizes society.
Hyper-capitalists who reach the top first game the system, which creates degenerative nepotism and destroys meritocracy. This leads to kakistocracy and gross wealth inequality, e.g., USA.
Wealth inequality requires a police state to protect the few “haves” from the many “have nots” and a draconian two-tier justice system to keep the “have nots” from mimicking the protected criminality of the “haves.”
Unregulated private foreign investment and personal wealth accumulation create super-rich transnational rootless cosmopolitans who hold no loyalty to the nation-state. Wealth caps redirect a rich man’s excessive personal wealth positively back into national projects, his adult children’s trust-funds (with the same annual limits), his company’s R & D, annual lifetime payouts, or his legitimate charity- emphasis on “legitimate.”
While I support personal wealth caps, I oppose taxation. I think modern monetary technology has made taxation obsolete. From my viewpoint, a tax-free 1-5 million USD / 7-35 million yuan annual salary maximum hits the spot- with excess principal held in a national escrow and distribution account.
Billionaires buy governments. Millionaires buy fun nights on the town.
For the record, I support universal basic income, socialized healthcare, and education-food-clothing-shelter as basic human rights. As robotics and AI replace human workers, provisions need to be made for the displaced. In Tao, leisure time can be extremely productive as well as beneficial to both the individual and nation. It beats WEF population culling.
I’m also fine with ethical entrepreneurship. Buying, selling, and trading run deep in human cellular memory and need to be factored in. Some workers find purpose and connection through their jobs. They just need a living wage and fair treatment.
The third daughter of hyper-capitalism is ecological destruction.
Plastic bottle islands that clog the oceans take 500 years to break down. Nano particles of plastic travel from fish to humans. Fracking chemicals contaminate underground freshwater aquifers for 3000 years. In this capitalist ecocide comedy, Nestlé and private equity buy the last clean water sources, profiting off the pollution.
As a higher civilization, it falls on China to take the lead in creating the technological-ecological yin-yang balance promoted by US scientist Buckminster Fuller. China’s Artificial Sun, biodegradable products development, robot asteroid mining, and other anti-pollution technologies show great promise for cleaning up the planet.
3- Beware of Jewish finance and its organized Jewry fronts.
To reiterate, I’m not anti-Jew. I’m anti-satanic Jew. “Post-Talmudic cellular memory” Jews have an important role in the future human ecosystem. As do all groups.
I’m not going to world-history review “Big Jew” financial predation. Rather, I want to focus on China’s 19th and 20th century encounters with global Jewish finance and its mercenaries as well as the impact of international Jewry’s “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” on the collective Chinese psyche.
During the Century of Humiliation, the Jewish Sassoon family and the Anglo-Rothschild British East India Company, along with other Jewish bankers and allied Euro-aristocrat cliques, controlled and looted China. Japan was a non-international finance outlier.
The solution to China’s colonialism problem was Marxism, a Jewish creation. One can argue Marxism’s pros and cons, but not its origin. Bottom line, a Jewish materialist ideology helped shape China during the latter half of the 20th century.
The outsourcing of American manufacturing to China was largely orchestrated by Jewish Wall Street with help from White globalization-gurus like General Electric CEO Jack Welch. Now, China is the big global manufacturer and a recipient of hyper-capitalism, thanks largely to international Jewish finance.
Much of this imported Judeo-dominant economic and ideological materialism contains socially-harmful elements, and while China received some short-game benefits, long-term exposure to alien constructs without proper cultural adjustment can be detrimental to the national body.
The cognitive “Great Wall” is like a cell membrane that lets in the good and filters out the bad.
4- Beware of engineered mass-migration.
The Dynasties didn’t build the actual Great Wall as a tourist attraction. For more data, consult Native Red Indians and or Palestinians.
5- Beware of Empire.
Empire follows a course of entropic degeneration, which hollows out the original entity that birthed it. The Roman rentier class acquired great riches while Rome’s plebeians lived in poverty. Charles Dickens’ England was rife with poor houses, debtors’ prisons, and slums- yet “the sun never set on the British Empire.”
If a post-mortem is ever conducted on the former United States republic, one of the big contributory factors to “cause of death” was the US taking over the role of “City of London-British Empire” after WW2. As the astute political scientist Chalmers Johnson noted: You can be an empire. You can be a republic. But you can’t be both.
Better to become a torch-bearing global role model that promotes a win-win game.
To reach the next level, humanity needs to sublimate war-tech into post-scarcity peace-tech. That requires the collapse of the US Anglo-Zionist Empire and its international banker controllers and their associates, as well as global managers giving up their unhealthy addiction to running slave-farm programs and pathological hoarding.
The “dog-eat-dog” / win-lose capitalist hustle is untenable in a high-tech civilization. The destructive power of the technology is too lethal.
As Marxist Rosa Luxemburg said, “It’s either socialism or barbarism.” The question is- whose socialism?
From my viewpoint, “socialism with Chinese characteristics” tied to win-win transactionalism and Confucian-Tao / high-technology balance offers a better way. Or at least something to consider.
No comments:
Post a Comment