Monday, December 30, 2024

"Welcome to Q2 XXI" by Dmitry Orlov

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: Club Orlov

Welcome to Q2 XXI


Why is it that Y2K was supposed to have been an earth-shattering event whereas the passing of the first quarter of the 21st century is commonly seen as a nonevent? This in spite of the fact that the world has changed dramatically and that this is something that has become plain to see just as the calendar approached the dividng line between Q1 and Q2 XXI? Here I will just list out some obvious changes that have occurred. For many people around the world these are obvious while others languish in denial. Here is a top-10 list of what I think we should expect in Q2 XXI.

1. The US will no longer be an industrial world power. It will still be a regional power but it is hard to predict for how long. US industrial production has treaded water since the turn of the century while other nations have leaped ahead. US industrial production grew by 10% since Y2K and by 0% since 2019. Meanwhile, starting from the turn of the century, China grew by close to 1000%, Russia by over 200%, India by over 320%. So-called "developed nations" (US and Western Europe) have not grown at all since 2019. Western European economies all peaked in 2007-8 except for Germany which peaked in 2017. Italy is the sickest patient of the bunch, its industrial production having decreased by a quarter so far this century.

2. The US will no longer be a military superpower. It is noncompetitive in both its weapons production (Russia can produce artillery shells 10 times faster) and in weapons development (having failed to develop any usable hypersound weapons systems and being far behind in missile defense technology). Its major investment in maritime power is in its aircraft carrier groups and they have been rendered obsolete by precision long-range weapons that can sink an aircraft carrier from a safe distance. Its nuclear deterrent is too old to be considered reliable. The entire US defense establishment, starting with the Pentagon and including the defense contractors and much of US Congress, is utterly corrupt.

3. Much of the terminology that people still habitually use is no longer applicable. There is no longer a "world order" that can be identified. "Globalism" is dead as the planet is splitting up into clubs of nations such as BRICS. "International law" is no longer an item, now that 40 thousand sanctions have been illegally imposed on Russia. Not that Russia is even complaining; since there is no longer a "world order" by which such illegal sanctions can be enforced, they don't mean much. Nor is there any longer an "international community" to speak of. Its latest reincarnation, the "rules-based international order" constantly prattled about by useless American busybodies, is likewise dead on arrival. Western neoliberalism is now openly rejected by much of the planet, including "unversal human values" and with them individualism, feminism, homosexuality and atheism/agnosticism. "Human rights" are falling increasingly out of fashion as much of the world is going back to the older set of universal values of faith, loyalty, honor, duty, merit and privilege earned through public service. Increasing numbers of Western families are claiming political refuge from the LGBT scourge by emigrating to Russia, Americans foremost among them (LGBT has been declared extremist and outlawed in Russia).

4. Given the shambles of electoral politics in the US and in Europe, Western-style "democracy" is no longer anything that anyone could reasonably aspire to. After the failure of every method legal and illegal to get rid of Trump, he is headed for inauguration — and that's the best outcome, since the will of the people was not suppressed. In other Western "democracies" the picture is not so rosy: in France, an effort is being made to disqualify Marine Le Pen from running, to make sure that she doesn't gain the presidency; in Germany, similar efforts are being made to outlaw Alternative for Germany. Add to that a failed color revolution attempt in Georgia after the Georgians did the unspeakable and voted for a government that is not anti-Russian. And Romania wasn't even allowed to get that far: its election results were invalidated after a non-anti-Russian outsider won in the first round. And then there is that "young democracy" — the Ukraine — still run by a president whose term has expired last May.

5. Climate catastrophism is no longer in fashion. Blaming nonexistent "global warming" on a trace chemical — CO2, which is actually plant food — no longer works. The "greenest" nation in the world, thanks to hydroelectric power and huge boreal forests, turns out to be Russia — oops! Solar panels and wind generators are nonrenewable: they have to be purchased again and again — from China! They are also not too useful because of the problem of intermittency, environmentally destructive and a major toxic waste disposal hazard. Having been swindled into pursuing the empty promise of "renewable energy", the US and Europe have lost the ability to build nuclear power plants quickly enough or cheaply enough to make a difference while Russia and China have both leaped ahead of them. Russia is now the main provider of nuclear power technology in the world and has succeeded in closing the nuclear fuel cycle, solving the problem of high-level nuclear waste disposal. Industrialists in the US are now talking about new nuclear power development but have no ability or expertise to make it happen.

6. Peak Oil is back on the menu. Since the conventional oil peak of 2005-6, shale oil produced in the US has made up for production declines just about everywhere else. But now it turns out that shale oil has also peaked at the very end of Q1 XXI and is now trending down. Meanwhile, Russia, which is another major oil producer, is increasingly finding better uses for its oil than to export it. It is now reasonable to expect that sometime not too far into Q2 XXI transportation fuels will be in increasingly short supply. Nations that depend on transoceanic shipping will be hurt the most. Of these, we should expect Western Europe to feel the most intense pain, having given up on both Russian hydrocarbon pipelines and nuclear energy and instead choosing to import liquefied natural gas from the US (which won't be coming for much longer).

7. The number of failed states around the world will continue to increase. At the top of the list for new failed-statedom are the few remaining secular Arab nations. Iraq, Libya and now Syria are already gone; Egypt may be next to fail. The term "territorial integrity," especially as it applies to various artificial lines on the map drawn in the course of or at the end of the colonial era, is not likely to remain aspirational for much longer. Similarly, the internal territorial boundaries drawn up by Bolsheviks that have miraculously survived the dissolution of the USSR are unlikely to continue to receive the respect they have never deserved. Likewise, "national sovereignty" will no longer be applied willy-nilly to nations that have no national sovereignty and are barely even nations. Syria is a case in point: it is some arbitrary chunk arbitrarily carved out of the remains of the Ottoman Empire. Israel is another. Lots of little statelets scattered around the world — Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Abkhazia, Transnistria, South Ossetia... — will need to merge with an actually sovereign entity, which will most likely end up being Russia.

8. In the absence of anything one might call an international world order or a universal system of international law, the world is becoming increasingly violent and messy. The few nations that retain their sovereignty and territorial integrity will close their borders to migration and will not provide humanitarian aid strictly on humanitarian grounds. They will not have the lattitude to help outsiders at the expense of their own citizens and any political leaders who attempt to do so will quickly be voted out or overthrown. Look at what has been happening with regard to the ongoing Israeli genocide in Palestine: lots of talk and hardly any action — not even symbolic action. Israeli sports teams are allowed to participate in international competitions, no questions asked. Look also at the eagerness with which countries in Europe have started discussing throwing out Syrian refugees as soon as Bashar Assad departed for Moscow, never mind that Syria is dissolving into chaos and civil war before their eyes.

9. As we head into Q2 XXI, artificial intelligence is all the buzz. The new AI chips are so power-hungry that tech companies are considering building new power plants especially to power them. But the reality of AI is not exactly all rosy. First of all, nobody knows how AI systems work; that is, their reasoning process is unfathomable even to the experts and a reasonable guess is that there is no reasoning process involved. It is already recongized that AI systems lie with great alacrity, cannot understand when they lie and when they don't, and readily contrive utterly false rationales for getting facts wrong. As the internet becomes inundated with content produced by AI systems, which will then serve as input to these same AI systems, a destructive feedback loop will become established, resulting in a garbage-in, garbage-out scenario. Once that happens, people will have to abandon the internet and to seek out printed books from before the advent of AI as the only sources of reliable information. Meanwhile, as AI becomes more and more deeply embedded in social systems, it will cease to be artificial and will become increasingly organic — commingled with human brains — and increasingly unintelligent. In the end, it will be down to very stupid, ignorant people completely reliant on very stupid, ignorant information systems. Once the lights go out, they will no longer know how to boil water.

10. Over the course of Q2 XXI, in various countries and communities around the world, depopulation will rear its ugly head. There are now many places where women give birth to fewer than two children, on average, and this means that the birth rate is below replacement and each next cohort will become smaller than the previous one. South Korea is perhaps the worst, with a fertility rate of just 0.72. This means that each next generation of South Koreans will be barely a third the size of the previous one. That way lies extinction. The survivors will be religious and patriarchal, for these are the communities with the highest birthrates. This may not sit well with certain liberal-minded readers, but the situation happens to be beyond anyone's control, so why fret about it. "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth."

Happy New Year!

Friday, December 27, 2024

"Here’s how the US burned millions ‘fighting propaganda’" by Rachel Marsden

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: RT

Here’s how the US burned millions ‘fighting propaganda’

Fed to the tune of $61 million a year, the Global Engagement Center was a failed attempt at narrative control
Here’s how the US burned millions ‘fighting propaganda’

If the nosy grandma peering out the window were a government entity, it would be the Global Engagement Center. The priciest hall monitor in history has just been given a pink slip. 

The Global Engagement Center, created by then President Barack Obama’s executive order in 2016, was supposed to help fight terrorist messaging. But the neocon majority in Congress successfully pushed for it to become more involved in fighting “Russian election interference” – or, more like flooding voters’ brains with the idea of it.

Its speech and narrative policing under the guise of combating fake news ultimately became so intolerable that its spending was just cut from the latest budget bill and its operations have now been shut down.

The center’s demise also may or may not have had something to do with the fact that it was exceptionally lazy and stupid, even as far as government initiatives go. American taxpayers have been paying $61 million a year for this entity to crank out a grand total of about eight reports over as many years. Yep, that’s about $61 million per report, one of which was called “Gendered Disinformation.”

Other activities include issuing press releases with titles like, “Faces of Kremlin Propaganda: Dmitri Peskov.” Oh wow, guys, you found one! And it’s none other than the public official whose actual job title is communications chief for the Kremlin. How many Americans would have otherwise been duped! Imagine Russians paying one of their government agencies tens of millions a year to “expose” the White House Press Secretary as speaking for Washington.

The center also spent a lot of resources promoting Russian-linked media as Russian-linked. And also as totally badass. They wouldn’t shut up about it, effectively generating one giant free advertising campaign targeting citizens who might be curious about this thing that’s managed to get under Washington’s skin so badly. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, citing the work of the center, called for the entire world to unite against RT. “We know that RT possesses cyber capabilities and engaged in covert information influence operations and military procurement,” he said in September 2024. Guess he was referring to my bulk ordering of missiles on Amazon Prime. 

China was another obsession. “Every country should have the ability to tell its story to the world,” began a report from 2023 titled “How the People’s Republic of China Seeks to Reshape the Global Information Environment.” It then proceeded to tell China exactly how it shouldn’t be telling its story to the world.

The Center accused China of “digital authoritarianism” and using “intimidation to silence dissent and encourage self-censorship.” Sounds like US academia. Or the Global Engagement Center.

How about France’s arrest of Telegram founder Pavel Durov last summer, now charged with enabling crimes like pedocriminality, fraud, and drug trafficking just for having created the platform? President Emmanuel Macron wined and dined Durov personally from 2018 to 2021, even giving him fast track French citizenship, and is now behaving like a psycho ex who didn’t get what he wanted. Like maybe the encryption keys. No statement from the center on that one, huh? Or on the comments by Durov’s former PR guy suggesting that Macron is just acting as a wingman for Washington in all this.

The center’s latest partner is Kiev, with which they set up the Ukraine Communications Group, along with Poland, to fight Russia informationally. If they have such a crack team, then why is it all over social media that the latest campaign out of Kiev, honoring Ukrainian fighters killed in Russia’s Kursk region at schools and social centers, shows supporters holding up “hero” headshots of porn stars Johnny Sins of “Brazzers” fame and Billy Harrington, instead?  How about the whole Azov neo-Nazi rebranding initiative? There’s such a lack of clarity or historical truth on that issue from the center that the entire Canadian parliament was brainwashed into clapping for a bona fide World War II-era Ukrainian Nazi last year.

What about the Ghost of Kiev and the heroes of Snake Island? Any interest in correcting those myths out of Kiev from the early days of the conflict? Or perhaps the center could have come to Kiev’s rescue when it was being blamed all over the Western press, from Germany to the US, for a covert operation to blow up the Nord Stream pipeline and taking out the Russian fuel for the EU’s economic engine along with it. Nothing but radio silence on that one. So is it true, then? Or is it just a much more convenient narrative to leave hanging out there in the public domain than the suggestion that Washington had anything to do with it?

In June 2024, the Center made a deal for cooperation with Romania to counter foreign election manipulation. The presidential election there was just recently cancelled, in the wake of a populist with a PhD in agronomy winning the first round of voting. Hardly surprising amid a farmers’ uprising against the EU’s heavy-handed regulations and favoritism for Ukrainian imports. Russian election interference via a paid TikTok campaign was blamed, which the investigative outlet Snoop.ro now says was actually paid for by the party of the current president – the same one that complained about the results and demanded a do-over. Guess the center never considered that on the meddling front, the call would be coming from inside the house.

Speaking of which, Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook and its parent company, Meta, admitted in a letter to the House Judiciary Committee in August that the Biden administration asked Facebook to censor Covid-19 content, including humor and satire, and that his teams complied. He also said that the FBI warned them about Russian disinformation on the Biden family’s dealings with Burisma (the Ukrainian energy company where Hunter Biden served on the board), which ultimately turned out not to be Russian fake news, even though Facebook had agreed to demote the story at the time. What’s that complaint about Chinese censorship again?

People are increasingly fed up with these efforts by Washington to obsessively patrol narratives in order to enforce its “rules based order” that primarily just serves special interests.

All you need to know about how annoyed Americans are is that they just voted for a first-class online troll as president, who has spent the last few days tweeting up a storm to everyone’s amusement, suggesting that the Panama Canal is American, Canada should be the 51st state, and Greenland should be owned by the US. The Global Engagement Center and its likeminded proponents have irritated everyone so much with their hounding attempts to impose their vision for the decor, that the bulldozer has now just straight-up ripped right through their own house.

Wednesday, December 25, 2024

"Urgent lessons for Russia from the Syrian and Armenian nightmares" by Declan Hayes

  

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: Strategic Culture Foundation

Urgent lessons for Russia from the Syrian and Armenian nightmares

Declan Hayes
     December 24, 2024

Russia, like the Assads, is not fighting a popularity contest. Russia, like the Assads’ Syria, is fighting for its life.

Join us on TelegramTwitter, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

  • Dr Hayes not only has a profound grasp of the Armenian genocide and the debt Armenians owe their Syrian saviours but he is able to plant it firmly within the context of the current war being waged against the Syrian people. ~ Armenian Ambassador to Syria, His Excellency, Arshak Poladian.
  • It was instructive to discuss the reconstruction of Syria today with the Irish academic, Dr Declan Hayes. ~ Kamal Eddin Touma, Minister of Industry, Syrian Arab Republic.
  • Declan Hayes is a witness for the terrible things that have been done to my tribe and to my people. ~ Mhd Deeb Al Youssef, Member of People’s Assembly, Syrian Arab Republic.
  • Dr Declan Hayes has proved himself to be a true and consistent friend of the Syrian people in their time of need. ~ Eng. Beshr Yazji, Minister of Tourism, Syrian Arab Republic.
  • The assistance Dr Declan Hayes has given us at Damascus University is both necessary and highly appreciated. ~ Atef Naddaf, Higher Education Minister, Syrian Arab Republic.
  • The work of Dr Declan Hayes is essential reading to grasp the enormity of the crimes being committed against the Syrian people. ~ Wael Nader al-Halqi, former Syrian Prime Minister, Syrian Arab Republic.
  • Dear Dr. Hayes: Thank you for disclosing the hidden truth about the Syrian War. It was never an “uprising;” its origins lay with the CIA, MI-6 and the host of vultures intent on destroying the Syrian people and ripping the flesh from their dead carcasses. Hundreds of billions were spent to topple the duly-elected government of Syria. Though small in numbers, Syria proved to be one of the world’s most stable, tenacious nations. Its army has fought with astounding gallantry and success against two-thirds of the world’s mightiest industrial and military powers. The multibillion-dollar propaganda campaign that western powers waged against Syria has deceived people. While reporting that America, France and Great Britain supported “moderate rebels, fighting for democracy,” our nations actually allied themselves with the world’s most brutal tyrants; the dictators of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey. Together, we supported hideous barbarians, who raped, beheaded, burned and crucified incredible numbers—then bragged openly of it by publishing videos of their atrocities. The West reacted as if by saying, “Move along now. Nothing to see here. Get along now with you!” Yet our penniless army of bulldog journalists like you has become a most vexing irritant to the vicious coalition we are leading in our effort to topple Syria. But the fight goes on. Please keep up the fight to defend Syria. Millions of Christians, Alawites and other Syrians depend on us for their survival. May God bless you and your work. ~ Senator Richard H. Black, USA.
  • You are a special person, a true warrior in The Army of God ~ Archbishop Hilarion Capucci, Syrian-Palestinian and pan-Arab national hero.
  • You have done the people of Syria a great service. May God bless you forever. ~ His Holiness, Patriarch Ignatius Ephraim, Global Leader of the Syriac Orthodox Church.
  • I thank the Irish citizen, Dr. Declan Hayes, who visited us in Syria. He visited my house and wrote a book about that. He swore that he would let my voice be heard. I thank Declan for that. ~ His Grace, Ahmad Badreddin Hassoun, Grand Mufti of Syria. Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees, Dublin, Ireland.
  • I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your great work on behalf of the people of Syria. ~ His Beatitude, Patriarch Gregorios Laham, Global Leader of the Greek Catholic Church.
  • Thank you for your generous donation to our school. It helped us to pay for counseling for the children who survived the double suicide bombing attack on them. ~ Ms Fatima Al Hussain, Principal, Akrameh al-Makhzum School, Homs, Syria.
  • Thank you, Dr Hayes, for paying for me to go to Turkey to bring Gafar Azouz, my sole surviving [baby] grandson, back to Damascus after our entire family were murdered trying to cross the border. ~ Ms Hagar Saleh, Damascus.
  • Hayes’ views on the merits of NATO and Western values, and the democratic freedoms that NATO seeks to protect, will not give any comfort to those whose duty it is to protect the UK. Frankly, it’s dangerous. ~ Crispin Blunt, MP.

We have a saying in Ireland that, though we may not have gone to school, we have met the scholars coming back. With that in mind, the above quotes are given to say that, though I may not have not been seduced with the dulcet words of Lord Ram, Vishu or Krishna as they returned from school, I have met many patriotic Syrians and Armenians who are far more knowledgeable than those who use this site to denigrate them.

As regards retired USMC Col Black, many folks like him understand the art and science of war much more deeply than those like me, who never went to Boot Camp, could ever hope to. Syria, as one patriotic Alawite explained in a nutshell to me over a decade ago, was like a giant buffalo, which was brought down by an unending number of spears being rammed into its vitals. The question with Syria then and Russia now is how to endure.

As regard the uninformed gutter sniping at Asma Assad, let me just say that I keep in touch with her family and, once Asma and her better half settle in Russia, I would hope to avail of his professional services as well as those of Fawaz Akhras, her Harley Street cardiologist father. I would also like to discuss with Asma how we can continue to support Syria’s military and civilian heroes. Call it my bourgeois prejudices but I love cultured women like her, who are a cut and more above their European equivalents, as they are above the rest of us.

Although Lord Ram, Vishu and Krishna might think the Assads betrayed Syria and Asma caught a bad dose of cancer as part of that charade, Kaouthar Bachraoui explained to me years ago that they were the biggest prisoners of the lot, at least so far as the war for Syria’s survival went.

Switching to Russia, we see its President issuing executive orders to its army and making all kinds of pronouncements on BRICS. The dismemberment of Syria and the coming war on Iran’s doorstep should be enough to put that concoction and those who endlessly prattle on about it on ice for the next decade.

Before Putin again turns his mind to that, he must first win the existential war Russia faces in Ukraine where, not unlike Assad, he thought NATO would play by the Queensbury Rules. As NATO is cockahoop about Syria’s destruction, Russia must expect the worst in the form of more assassinations (as in Tehran and Damascus).

Russia boasts of all its new weapons and it warns Rheinmettal about hiding behind Romania’s Ukrainian border. Fine! Turn those factories into ash and turn parts of Ukraine into a car park. Then return for the double tap. Although Russia’s High Command has no doubt worked through all such scenarios, they must act resolutely if Russia is not to become another Syria.

The IRA had a unique approach to issues like this. They would simply assassinate British politicians and blow up their financial infrastructure to catch their attention. Not the Queensbury Rules but it worked. As far as Ukraine is concerned, that is a risk free NATO bet as Ukrainian canon fodder is of no consequence to them. Unless Russia destroys Ukraine, Russia will be finished in the same way the secular Syrian Arab Republic, Iraq and Libya were. As Russia is not going to win any Western popularity contest any time soon, it would be much better off making its point, as the IRA did before it. Russia, like the IRA of decades ago, must call the shots

Russia cannot be deflected by the pie in the sky of BRICS, not at least until the Zelensky regime is hung, drawn and quartered and the punk states of the Baltics learn the hard way their neo-Nazi posturing is not worth the candle.

Russia, like the Assads, is not fighting a popularity contest. Russia, like the Assads’ Syria, is fighting for its life. Time to wake up and smell the coffee. And let Zelensky and his fellow crooks smell the napalm. And an avalanche of Oreshnik hypersonic missiles as well.

"Another expert report finds Israel is committing genocide. The West yawns" by Jonathan Cook

  

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: Jonathan Cook

Another expert report finds Israel is committing genocide. The West yawns

Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, and Medecins Sans Frontieres are all agreed. But the Gaza genocide is now just another routine news item, buried on the inside pages

Middle East Eye – December 24 2024

Three separate reports published this month by leading international human rights and medical groups have detailed the same horrifying story: that Israel is well advanced in its genocide of the Palestinian population in Gaza.

Or, to be more accurate, they have confirmed what was already patently clear: that, for the past 14 months, Israel has been slaughtering tens of thousands of Palestinians with indiscriminate munitions, while at the same time gradually starving the survivors to death and denying them access to medical care.

Genocides can happen with gas chambers. Or with machetes. Or they can be carried out with 2,000lb bombs and aid blockades. Genocides rarely look the same. But they are all designed to arrive at the same endpoint: the elimination of a people.

Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) agree that Israel is striving for extermination. It has not hidden its intent, and that intent is confirmed by its actions on the ground.

Only the wilfully blind, which includes western politicians and their media, are still in denial. But worse than denial, they continue to actively collude in this, the ultimate crime against humanity, by supplying Israel with the weapons, intelligence and diplomatic cover it needs for the extermination.

Last week, MSF issued its report, titled Life in the Death Trap That is Gaza, concluding that Israel was intentionally “unravelling the fabric of society”.

The medical charity observed: “The violence unleashed by Israeli forces has caused physical and mental damage on a scale that would overwhelm any functioning health system, let alone one already decimated by a crushing offensive and a 17-year-long blockade [by Israel].”

MSF added: “Even if the offensive ended today, its long-term impact would be unprecedented, given the scale of the destruction.”

Rebuilding the society and dealing with the health consequences will “span generations”.

Intention proven

MSF’s findings followed hot on the heels of an 185-page report by Human Rights Watch, which concluded that Israel was committing “acts of genocide”.

The organisation limited its focus to one Israeli policy: its systematic effort to deprive the population of access to water – a clear measure of intentionality, the critical yardstick for judging whether mass killing has crossed into genocide.

At a news conference, Lama Fakih, HRW’s Middle East director, said their research had proved Israel was “intentionally killing Palestinians in Gaza by denying them the water that they need to survive”.

Israel had done so in four coordinated moves. It had blocked pipelines supplying water from outside Gaza. It had then cut off power to run the pumps that Gaza’s own supplies from wells and desalination plants depended on.

Next, it had destroyed the solar panels that were the backup to deal with such power cuts. And finally, it had killed crews trying to repair the supply system and aid agency staff trying to bring in water supplies.

“This is a comprehensive policy preventing people from getting any water,” HRW’s acting Israel and Palestine director, Bill Van Esveld, concluded. He added that the group had made “a very clear finding of extermination”.

‘Pattern of conduct’

HRW echoed a much wider-ranging report by Amnesty International, the world’s best-known international human rights organisation.

In a 296-page report published in early December, Amnesty concluded that Israel had been “brazenly, continuously” committing genocide in Gaza – or “unleashing hell” as the organisation phrased it more graphically.

The period of Amnesty’s research ended in July, five months ago. Since then, Israel has further intensified its destruction of northern Gaza to drive out the population.

Nonetheless, Amnesty described a “pattern of conduct” in which Israel had deliberately obstructed aid and power supplies, and detonated so much explosive power on the tiny enclave – equivalent to more than two nuclear bombs – that water, sanitation, food and healthcare systems had collapsed.

The scale of the attack, it noted, had caused death and destruction at a speed and level unmatched in any other 21st-century conflict.

Budour Hassan, Amnesty’s researcher for Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, said Israel’s actions went beyond the individual war crimes associated with conflicts: “This is something deeper.”

Agreeing with major Holocaust and genocide scholars, Amnesty concluded that the high bar needed to prove genocidal intent in law was crossed last May when Israel began destroying Rafah, the area in southern Gaza that it had herded Palestinian civilians into as a supposedly “safe zone”.

Israel had been warned not to attack Rafah by the world’s highest court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), but went ahead anyway.

‘Mass denial’

For some time, leading Holocaust and genocide scholars – among them Israelis – have been speaking up to warn not only that a genocide is unfolding, but that it is nearing completion.

Last week, Omer Bartov even managed to get his message out on CNN. He told Christiane Amanpour that Israel was carrying out “a war of annihilation” on the Gaza Strip. “What the IDF [Israeli military] is doing there is destroying Gaza,” he said.

Amos Goldberg, another Israeli Holocaust expert, noted that Raphael Lemkin, a Jewish-Polish scholar who coined the term “genocide”, described its two phases.

“The first is the destruction of the annihilated group and the second is what he called ‘imposition of the national pattern’ of the perpetrator. We are now witnessing the second phase as Israel prepares ethnically cleansed areas for Israeli settlements.”

Goldberg added: “Like in every other case of genocide in history, right now we have mass denial. Both here in Israel and around the world.”

Bartov’s invitation by CNN appeared to have been provoked by an article in Haaretz, Israel’s most liberal newspaper. It published last week testimonies from Israeli combat soldiers, in which they described committing and witnessing war crimes in Gaza. They paint a picture of systematic erasure that, even from their limited perspective, looks ominously like genocide.

The soldiers describe shooting dead anyone who moves inside undeclared so-called “kill zones”, even children, and then claiming them to be “terrorists”. The dead are left to be eaten by packs of dogs.

The only words one Israeli reservist found to describe Israel’s repeated and intentional killing of children in Gaza was “pure evil”.

According to a senior reserve commander recently returned from the enclave, the Israeli army has created “a lawless space where human life holds no value”.

Another says units compete to see who can kill the greater number of Palestinians, indifferent to whether they are Hamas fighters or civilians.

Others describe these units as operating like “independent militias”, unrestrained by military protocols.

‘Everyone is a terrorist’

How the Israeli army implemented the Gaza genocide is alluded to in the Haaretz article. After the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023, the military leadership devolved normally centralised decision-making to local field commanders.

Many of those commanders live in the most religiously extreme of the illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Not only are they Jewish supremacists, but they follow rabbis who believe all Palestinians, even babies, pose a threat to the Jewish people and must be exterminated.

Notoriously, a group of influential settler rabbis formalised their genocidal teachings into a book called The King’s Torah.

One senior commander identified by Haaretz is Brigadier General Yehuda Vach, a settler from Kiryat Arba, possibly the most extreme of all Israel’s West Bank settlements.

For many years, Vach headed the military’s officers training school, passing on his extreme views to a new generation of officers, presumably some of whom are now making decisions in Gaza.

Today, he heads Division 252, in which many of the soldiers who spoke to Haaretz have served.

One of his officers recounted how, after Hamas’ military leader Yahya Sinwar was killed in October, Vach held an official meeting to determine what to do with his body. He wanted to strip Sinwar’s corpse naked, put it in a public square, dismember it and pour sewage over the remains.

In an address to soldiers, he is reported to have echoed a genocidal view widely shared in Israel, that “there are no innocents in Gaza”. Even Israel’s supposedly liberal President Isaac Herzog has said as much.

But according to one officer, Vach has made this view an “operational doctrine”.

Vach’s view of Palestinians is that “everyone’s a terrorist”. And that means, given Israel’s current, explicit aims in Gaza, everyone must be killed.

Nothing sticks

None of this should surprise us. Israeli leaders from the very start announced their genocidal intent. And more than a year ago, Israeli soldiers serving in Gaza began telling us of the systematic nature of Israel’s war crimes.

But like everything about this genocide, those accounts made no impact on the western political and media consensus. Nothing has stuck, even when it is the soldiers themselves documenting their atrocities, and even when it is Israeli Holocaust experts concluding that these crimes amount to genocide.

It has been nearly a year since the ICJ, comprising more than a dozen internationally respected judges, decided that a “plausible” case had been made that Israel was carrying out a genocide in Gaza.

The judiciary is amongst the most conservative of professions.

The situation in Gaza is incalculably worse than it was last January when the court issued its ruling.

But the wheels of justice are required to turn slowly, even though Gaza does not have time on its side.

How is this permanent condition of mass denial possible? There is nothing normal or natural about it. The denial is being actively and furiously manufactured.

Only because we live in a world where billionaires own our politicians and media do we need courts and human rights groups to confirm what we can already see quite clearly being live-streamed to our devices.

Only because we live in a world owned by billionaires do those same courts and rights organisations spend long months weighing the evidence to protect themselves from the inevitable backlash of smears aimed at discrediting their work.

And only because we live in a world owned by billionaires is it possible, even after all those delays, for our politicians and media to ignore the findings and carry on as before.

The system is rigged to favour the imperial hub of the United States and its client states.

If you are an African dictator, or an official enemy of the so-called West, the most minimal evidence suffices to prove your guilt.

If you are under the protection of the US godfather, no amount of evidence will ever be enough to put you behind bars.

It is known as realpolitik.

Always another story

For many months, the western media’s role has been to gaslight us by pretending the genocide is something else.

First, the mass slaughter of Palestinians was presented simply as a natural desire by Israel to eliminate “terrorism” on its doorstep following the Hamas attack of 7 October 2023.

It was chiefly a story of Israeli “self-defence” that conveniently overlooked the preceding decades in which Israel had driven Palestinians off their land, either out of their homeland entirely or into ghettoes, then colonised the land illegally with apartheid-style Jewish settlements, and subjected the Palestinian ghettoes to brutal Israeli military rule.

In the coverage after 7 October, the Palestinians – long the victims of an illegal occupation – were viewed as squarely to blame for their own suffering. To suggest anything else – to worry that a genocide was unfolding – was a sure sign of antisemitism.

Then, as the slaughter intensified – as Gaza was levelled, hospitals wrecked, the population collectively punished with an aid blockade – the official story faltered.

So a new narrative was advanced: of international efforts to reach a ceasefire ending “the cycle of violence”, of the focus on securing the release of the hostages, of Hamas intransigence.

We were back to the familiar framework of an intractable conflict, in which both sides were to blame – though, of course, the Palestinians more so.

Now, as it becomes impossible to continue pretending that Israel wants peace, to ignore the fact that it is expanding the slaughter, not reining it in, the media strategy has shifted once again.

As the genocide reaches its “final stage” – as the Israeli Holocaust scholars Omer Bartov and Amos Goldberg warn – the media have largely lost interest. If there is no way to both-sides the genocide, then it must be disappeared.

And in media-land, there is always another story that can be promoted. There will always be another front-page lead rather than the most disturbing one of all, in which western leaders and the media are full participants in the live-streamed extermination of a people.

BBC buries the news

That is the context for understanding the media’s collective yawn as the three genocide reports dropped one after another this month.

Israel’s accusations that Amnesty’s report was antisemitic were entirely expected. What should not have been was the media’s largely indifferent response.

The BBC was a case study in how to bury bad news. Its flagship television news programmes – the dominant news source for Britons – ignored the story completely.

Meanwhile, its poor cousin, the 24-hour news channel, which draws a far smaller audience, did mention the Amnesty report, but captioned it: “Israel rejects ‘fabricated’ claims of genocide.”

In other words, when the BBC did offer very limited coverage, it skipped the news story of Amnesty’s findings and went straight to Israel’s predictable, outraged reaction.

In an investigation for Drop Site News last week, Guardian columnist Owen Jones spoke to 13 current and recently departed BBC staff. They said the corporation’s coverage of Gaza was heavily skewed to present Israel’s actions in a favourable light.

In a WhatsApp chat for senior BBC Middle East editors, correspondents and producers, one participant – incensed by the “fabricated claims” caption – wrote: “FFS! – It’s an open goal for those who say we’re frit [afraid] of upsetting the Israelis and keep on couching our stories in an ‘Israel says’ narrative’.”

The BBC’s website, by far the most influential English-language online news source, inexplicably ignored the Amnesty report for 12 hours after the embargo was lifted.


Even then, it appeared as the seventh item. For the following week, it was not included in the “Israel-Gaza” index on the website’s front page, making it unlikely it would be found.

This pattern has long been true in the BBC’s coverage of Israel and Palestine, but it has become far more glaring since the stakes were raised for Israel by its genocide.

As Jones’s investigation discloses, BBC management has tightly restricted control over the Gaza coverage to a small number of journalists known to hew closely to Israel’s view of events – and despite their editorial role provoking what Jones calls a “civil war” in the BBC newsroom.

Notably, Jones did not publish his investigation in the Guardian, where there have been similar reports of staff indignant at the paper’s failure to give proper weight to the genocidal nature of Israel’s actions.

Rigged algorithms

What the BBC has been doing is not exceptional. As soon as a light is shone into the dark recesses of the state- and billionaire-owned media, the same picture always emerges.

Last week, an investigation revealed that Meta, the company that owns Facebook and Instagram, intentionally rigged its algorithms to suppress reports from the biggest Palestinian news sources after the Hamas attack of 7 October 2023.

Palestinian news outlets saw their views on Meta platforms fall significantly after the attack – on average by 77 percent – when they should have expected to see far greater interest. By contrast, views of Israeli news outlets rose sharply.

Paradoxically, the investigation was published by the BBC, though notably the research was initiated and carried out by the staff of its Arabic news service.

Also last week, more than a dozen whistleblowers from Deutsche Welle, Germany’s equivalent of state broadcaster the BBC, revealed to Al Jazeera that a culture of fear reigns in the newsroom when it comes to critical coverage of Israel.

Similar reports from whistleblowing staff have exposed the rigged nature of the coverage – always in Israel’s favour – in other major outlets, from CNN to the New York Times and the Associated Press news agency.

In reality, the same skewed news agenda can be found in every newsroom in every corporate media outlet. It just requires whistleblowers to come forward, and for there to be someone willing to listen and in a position to publish.

Why? Because a genocide unfolding in plain sight cannot be made to appear normal without an enormous expenditure of effort from institutional media to close the eyes of their audiences. To hypnotise us into indifference.

State of anxiety

Too many of us are susceptible to this process – and for a number of reasons.

In part, because we still trust these institutions, even though their chief function is to persuade us that they are there for our benefit – rather than the reality that they serve the interests of the larger corporate structures to which they belong.

Those western structures are invested in resource theft, asset-stripping and wealth concentration – all, of course, pursued at the expense of the global south – and the war industries needed to make this pillage possible.

But also, it is part of our psychological makeup that we cannot sustain attention on bad news indefinitely.

To watch a genocide unfold week after week, month after month, and be unable to do anything to stop it, takes a terrible toll on our mental health. It keeps us in a permanent state of anxiety.

The corporate structures that oversee our media understand this only too well. Which is why they cultivate a sense of powerlessness amongst their audiences.

The world is presented as a baffling place, where there are inexplicable forces of evil that act without any comprehensible causation to destroy all that is good and wholesome.

The media suggest international affairs are little different from a game of whack-a-mole. Whenever the good West tries to solve a problem, another evil mole pops up its head, whether it be Hamas terrorists, Hezbollah terrorists, Syria’s former dictator Bashar al-Assad, or the mad mullahs of Iran.

With this as the framework for the Gaza genocide, audiences are left sensing either that what is happening to Palestinians, however horrifying, may be deserved or that investing too much concern is a waste of energy and time. Another crisis will be along in a moment equally demanding of our attention.

And so it will. Because that is precisely the way the corporate media works. It offers a conveyor belt of bad news, one bewildering event after another – whether it be another disgraced celebrity, or murdered schoolgirl, or an outbreak of war.

The media’s role – the reason states and corporations keep such a tight grip on it – is to stop us from gaining a wider picture of the world, one on which our hands look far more bloodied than the “terrorists” we sit in judgment on. One where a powerful western elite, its corporate empire headquartered in the US, runs the planet as nothing more than a wealth-extraction machine.

And so we, the publics of the West, shrug our shoulders once again: at “man’s inhumanity to man”, at “the cycle of violence”, at “the barbarians at the gate”, at “the white man’s burden”.

Nearly 15 months on, the Gaza genocide has become entirely normal, it has become just another minor, routine news item to be buried on the inside pages.

Disqus