Sunday, July 6, 2025

"'Israel' Backfires" by Kevin Barrett

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: Kevin's Newsletter


 
Kevin’s Newsletter
Truth Jihad Radio
"Israel" Backfires
0:001:11:13
 
Listen now
 

"Israel" Backfires

Are Jews their own worst enemies?

 
READ IN APP
 

Rumble link Bitchute link

In 2006 I was for all intents and purposes expelled from the American academy as a 9/11 heretic. The ADL was already calling me an antisemite, though at that point I was downplaying Israel’s role in the attacks on New York and Washington.

During the six-month media firestorm, ignited by Rep. Steve Nass and the Wisconsin Republican Party’s demand that the University fire me outright, U.W.-Madison Provost Patrick Farrell repeatedly advised me to decline interviews and lay low. I refused, instead opting to accept most interview requests and court controversy. I hoped that intelligent people in general, and academicians in particular, would hear about my academic freedom fight, support it, and take a second look at the self-evidently ridiculous official story of 9/11.

Though plenty of intelligent people did wake up to the 9/11 problem after seeing me debate Sean Hannity, I was disappointed by the tepid reaction of the professoriat. Most offered halfhearted support for my academic freedom, but few were willing to openly challenge the official story of 9/11. I suppose they didn’t want to find themselves in my position, raked over the coals of mostly-negative mainstream media attention. The few who did speak out, like William Woodward, also endured media attacks, albeit on a smaller scale than mine.

By the time Rep. Steve Nass and Fox News ambushed me in early July, 2006, over 100 professors had already signed on to Scholars for 9/11 Truth. I hoped and expected that the controversy over my case would quickly bring hundreds more onboard. Based on my experience with academic colleagues, I believed that more than a few of them were smart, cantankerous, and (hopefully) unlikely to put up with rank 9/11 bullshit, once the issue had been called to their attention.

Herbert Feinstein: Recovering Mob Lawyer, Black Humorist

One of the smartest and most cantankerous academics I ever met was the late Herbert Feinstein, a scholar-fan of Mark Twain and Buster Keaton who taught comedy-related classes at San Francisco State University while I was collecting MAs and teaching there circa 1986-1993. Herb was fond of Racine’s line about how life is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy to those who feel. I shared his appreciation of humour noir, gallows humor, absurdist humor, and combinations thereof, and he gets some of the credit (or blame) for my penchant for satire.

Herb Feinstein was famously crotchety, not known for suffering fools gladly, and far from the most popular member of the SFSU faculty. He exuded inner torment and barely-veiled self-loathing, which seemed somehow inseparable from his charmingly dark sense of humor. I enjoyed his wit and gradually got to know him over the course of a couple of comedy classes.

Feinstein told me that he had worked in Hollywood and had firsthand knowledge of the sexual blackmail that goes on there. He said many A-list actors got their start in the porn industry, assured me that a great many such films were in private hands, and mentioned Sylvester Stallone. He made several allusions to his own bad experiences in that milieu. So I wasn’t surprised that his obituary included these lines:

He began practicing law at MCA in Los Angeles in the early ’50s, working for film studio boss Lew Wasserman, which is where Feinstein fostered interests and relationships which would span the course of his five decades of professional life. Perhaps it was the proximity of the mafia to the film business, perhaps his inner scholar calling, but Feinstein left Hollywood for the Bay Area in the mid-’50…

Feinstein’s inner pain and self-loathing, and the dark humor he treated it with, presumably stemmed in part from his experiences with the Hollywood (Jewish) mafia and the adjacent intelligence agency milieu. Having earned his BA from Columbia while still in his teens, Feinstein quickly picked up a Harvard law degree, served in Naval Intelligence, became a mob lawyer for LA kingpin Lew Wasserman…and then had some sort of non-lethal falling out with that world, moved to Berkeley, did a Ph.D. on Mark Twain’s legal affairs, and wound up teaching comedy at San Francisco State.

I never got a chance to talk to Feinstein about 9/11. Given his background and outlook, I assumed he probably wouldn’t be first in line to join Scholars for 9/11 Truth, so I didn’t reconnect with him. But looking back, I wish I had. He probably knew or suspected that Israel did it, though I doubt he would have wanted to say that in public.

Their Own Worst Enemies

Herb Feinstein’s outlook on life turned on his frequent observation that people are their own worst enemies. Irrationally self-destructive behavior, he believed, is so common as to be almost ubiquitous.

Feinstein’s “own worst enemies” worldview struck me, even then, as quintessentially Jewish. At the time (the 1980s) I had largely bought into the Jewish victim narrative, so I saw the Jewish penchant for dark humor about people digging their own graves as a response to the ubiquitous persecution that Jews had experienced for thousands of years. I figured Jews used gallows humor to laugh off their pain, and to wonder whether they were somehow bringing it on themselves.

Today, after further research, I’ve concluded that Jews have very definitely been bringing it on themselves. They really are their own worst enemies. Goy persecution stems from Jewish behavior, not some mysterious irrational Jew-hatred that would have persisted, for no reason, across every culture for millennia.

For a spectacular exhibition of Jews being their own worst enemies, look no further than the Jewish state of Israel. Its genocide of Gaza has long since exhausted any sympathy the uninformed may have felt in the wake of October 7, 2023, and is driving the irreversible delegitimization of the Zionist project.

Even more starkly, Israel’s June 13 attack on Iran—the culmination of Netanyahu’s decades-long campaign—has backfired spectacularly. The war had two goals: removing Iran’s “nuclear threat” and triggering regime change. Israel didn’t just fail to achieve those goals. It brought Iranian nuclear weapons much closer, and made regime change even less likely, than would have been the case in the absence of war. Iranians of all stripes have united behind the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Republican form of government. And a consensus is forming, not only in Iran but in nuclear nations including Russia, Pakistan, and North Koriea, that the Islamic Republic of Iran needs a nuclear weapon ASAP to deter further attacks.

Perhaps even worse for Israel’s prospects, the aborted war on Iran punctured the Zionist myth of invincibility. Iranian rockets rained down on strategic targets in such numbers that Netanyahu had to run to Trump for an exit. Had Iran wanted to destroy Israel’s life-supporting infrastructure it could have done so. Salim Mansur writes:

Iran possessed the capability to destroy the water desalination plants in Israel as much as the main power grids and reduce Israel into what Israelis have done to the people in Gaza. But Iran did not target the source of drinking water in Israel, nor the power grids. Would Iran have done so if the ceasefire was not agreed upon? I don’t think so. The red lines for Iran in a war imposed on Iranians are self-imposed based on their religious tradition…

The small Zionist settler colony squatting on stolen land has underlined its own vulnerability. It no longer has escalation dominance. Its nuclear deterrent is of dubious relevance given the mutual assured destruction that Iran can threaten with non-nuclear means (and which will likely be supplemented by nukes, whether homemade or purchased, in the not-so-distant future).

Israel’s current predicament is just a more acute version of its longstanding one: Who could ever have believed that the best way to protect Jews from the universal persecution they have always supposedly experienced would be to pack them all together in a small genocidal settler colony, surrounded by people who hate them? The Zionists who dreamed up that “solution” to their version of the Jewish Problem were quintessential examples of “their own worst enemies.”

Today, thanks to its ill-conceived genocide and war, Israel has undermined whatever chance it may have had of becoming a peaceful and prosperous regional country with an assured future. It is its own worst enemy on steroids. And its vision of “Hamas savages” is a self-projection. Israelis, who have made killer-rapists their national heroes, are the savages. Deep down inside, they know it. They hate themselves, and project that hate on the other. The Zionist Jew is his own worst enemy, in the sense that the unbearably evil enemy he fears is a disguised image of himself…a terrible truth that just makes the whole thing that much more unbearable.

Herb Feinstein sought to understand humans’ propensity for self-destruction by way of Sigmund Freud’s death wish. Herb wasn’t an ideologue, much less a card-carrying Freudian, but he did think the death wish hypothesis was one of the few serious attempts to explain the “own worst enemy” syndrome.

The Source of Self-Hating Jew Syndrome?

Today, a revisionist anti-Freud school holds that psychoanalytic woo-woo about kids wanting to have sex with their parents is itself a classic defense mechanism against the terrible truth that many children suffer all-too-real abuse. Jumping on that bandwagon, I propose that “self-hating Jew syndrome” is largely the product of circumcision. When the rabbi inflicts unspeakable torture on the week-old baby by taking a knife to the most sensitive part of the child’s anatomy, he isn’t just instilling lifelong PTSD in his victim: He is breaking the child’s “secure attachment” bond with its Jewish mother, who will spend the rest of her live overcompensating for having turned her baby over to a torturer.

Subjected to an unspeakable atrocity, his bond with his mother deeply wounded, the Jewish male baby grows up damaged, and first blames himself for his suffering. But gradually he is inculcated into the tribal belief that the evil aggressor, the boogieman-torturer whose awful image lingers in his unconscious memory, is the archetypal goy, the non-Jew, who has pursued and persecuted the poor innocent Jews across thousands of years and countless locations out of sheer unadulterated villainy.

A bizarre blend of that self-hate and other-hate persists, cements the Jewish tribe together, and manifests itself in the ghettos Jews build for themselves, including the genocidal horrorshow ghetto known as “Israel.” (Those who begin to recover from self-hatred by recognizing that the hate stems from the Jewish side, not the goyish one, are insulted as “self-hating Jews” by the ones who are still mired in hatred.)

My frequent radio guest Alan Hart, who passed away in 2018, titled his trilogy Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews. And while Alan Hart understood that the state of Israel was indeed the enemy of the Jews, I’m not sure he fully grasped how the Jewish State exemplifies the larger Jewish genius for being one’s own worst enemy.


Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate.

Friday, July 4, 2025

"How Donald went to war" by Dmitry Orlov

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: Club Orlov

Jul 02 06:18

How Donald went to war

Who won? To get at this question, let me tell you a story. Some might call it a "narrative" but it's really just a story. I'll let you decide whether it's entirely factual or somewhat fictional (some persnickety people can always point out some details that just don't fit the overall picture) but I will try to keep it as grounded in fact as I can.

Once upon a time there was a country called Usania which was (ostensibly) run by nutcases. There were plenty of sane Usanians to choose from but none of them wanted to be president. As the great Usanian writer Kurt Vonnegut aptly put it, "only nutcases want to be president." This was because, nutcases or not, presidents were not allowed to run Usania but only pretended to do so because of something called "checks and bounces". Or something like that. And this dissuaded non-nutcase Usanians from trying out for such a silly job.

And given that they were, as it were, all nutcases, the presidents were, quite wisely, not allowed to actually run Usania and this prerogative was secretly handed over to shadowy players who were kept out of the public eye as much as possible. These apparatchiks never faced public scrutiny and never stood for elections; consequently, there was no corrective feedback mechanism that could have weeded out the idiots, the psychopaths and the cleptomaniacs from their midst. Total degeneracy ensued, creeping up slowly at first, then bursting out into the open when the entire world was forced to bear witness as around Anno Domini 2020 Usania became an unreformable, ungovernable, internally conflicted mess.

Right around this time Usania ran out of nutcases who wanted to be president, and so they "elected" (in a manner of speaking, for Usania was never really a democracy) a senile old man named Joe who had never worked a day in his life (smelling up the halls of congress doesn't count) and stumbled through his four years as the supposed Nutcase in Chief, attempting to shake hands with ghosts, sniffing and biting people and spending most of the time in hiding while the apparatchiks forged his signature on countless official documents, including ones that pardoned them from any offenses, real or imaginary, that they may or may not have committed or were perhaps planning to commit.

When the "election" time rolled around and Joe's incapacity became shockingly obvious, he was hastily replaced with a mentally retarded Indian woman whose qualifications for the high office were her lack of testicles and her fashionably dark skin — that and her mad cackle, which indeed qualified her as a nutcase. As her feeble-mindedness became a matter of public discourse, she lost the "election" to a proper nutcase: a narcissistic bloviating buffoon named Donald, who had previously taken a stab at being Nutcase in Chief, with disastrous consequences, but showed up for more of the same anyway. His qualifications for leadership included his experience in running real estate swindles, organizing gambling institutions, running contests for large-breasted, toothy women and fake wrestling competitions and playing the lead role in reality shows with lots of peons where he got to say "You're fired!" whenever one of these peons screwed up.

During the tenure of the brain-dead Joe the apparatchiks came up with a truly harebrained plan to overthrow Russia's dread dictator Putin. This had been an idée fixe for these apparatchiks for a long time. They armed and trained some Ukrainians, the Ukraine being a piece of Russia which it had temporarily sloughed off during the dissolution of the USSR, as Russia would sometimes do, being such a large country and at times difficult to hold together. The apparatchiks ordered the Ukrainians to attack the Russians living in what was at the time the eastern part of the Ukraine, forcing Russia to intervene to protect its people. A clinical example of delusional thinking, the apparatchiks thought that the demoralized Russian troops would throw down their rusty weapons and run away, the Russian government would fall apart and the Russian people would rise up and overthrow the dread dictator Putin. Somehow, they had failed to notice how over the course of Putin's long reign Russia has once again become rich, prosperous, very well armed and expertly managed. They also neglected to notice that Putin consistently enjoys approval ratings of around 80%, making it highly unlikely that the 20% who do not wholeheartedly approve of him could be induced to revolt and to overthrow him. A nasty and prolonged armed conflict ensued in which over a million Ukrainians and tens of thousands of Russians lost their lives.

By the time senile old Joe was turned out to pasture and bloviating buffoon Donald once again became Nutcase in Chief, it had become abundantly clear that the Ukraine had lost the war, with the frontline advancing in Russia's favor slowly but relentlessly. Donald's handlers did their best to portray this defeat as senile old Joe's fault and made several misguided attempts to stop the carnage, but that simply wasn't enough. What Donald's quickly fading public image needed was a whole new military victory. Then the Usanians, who have attention spans of between 6 and 8 minutes, conditioned by standard sitcom segment length, would forget all about the Ukrainian defeat and only think about the great new victory.

But where to start a war? Bibi, the Israeli prime minister, who had been holding onto this position for dear life in order to avoid going to jail for corruption, offered to help: why don't we attack Iran with the excuse of having to destroy its nuclear weapons program (which Bibi thought up based on no information) and replace its government with one that Donald and Bibi would like? Donald's apparatchiks jumped up and down with glee and off they went to war. Israel launched a campaign of political assassination against the Iranian leadership by activating sleeper cells inside Iran which Israel had been cultivating since around 2010. The mighty Usanian military then swung into action and made some impressive-looking bomb craters at the entrances to the cave in which, the Usanian apparatchiks reckoned, Iran's nuclear bombs might be hiding.

Needless to say, the war went just as badly as the one in the Ukraine, but it only took 12 days instead of three years to reach the stage of total fiasco. Bibi then begged Donald to make the Iranians stop lobbing rockets at Israel that were steadily destroying Israel's ports, oil refineries, military facilities and electric grid. Donald then opted for Plan B — of playing the peacemaker — and told Israel and Iran to knock it off. When they didn't immediately knock it off but continued lobbing missiles at each other, he dropped some f-bombs. Eventually the rocket duel did stop, and Donald started looking forward to receiving the Nobel Peace Prize. What he got instead was a rather large scandal over his handling of the issue of Iran's reputed nuclear weapons program, calling into question whether such a program existed at all and, if so, whether Donald's attack on it destroyed it, slowed it or hastened it.

"Now What?" by Patrick Lawrence

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: ScheerPost

Patrick Lawrence: Now What?

 July 3, 2025 
A U.S. Air Force B-2 Spirit is prepared for operations ahead of Operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, June 2025. United States Air Force, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
In one of the scariest moments in modern history, we're doing our best at ScheerPost to pierce the fog of lies that conceal it but we need some help to pay our writers and staff. Please consider a tax-deductible  donation.

By Patrick Lawrence / Original to ScheerPost

On one hand, you have the White House, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Dan Caine, the Joint Chiefs chairman, insisting and insisting again — insisting too much, methinks — that those B–2 bombers that flew over Iran two Sundays back, June 22, obliterated the nation’s nuclear program just as President Trump hastily claimed as soon as the operation was completed.

Hegseth at a news conference with Caine four days later: “U.S. attacks have effectively destroyed Iran’s centrifuge enrichment program …. You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated, choose your word. This was an historically successful attack, and we should celebrate it as Americans.”

Trump, at a news conference the next day: “The place was bombed to hell …. The last thing they’re thinking about now is nuclear weapons.”

And in the background you have the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency performing Difficulty 5 back flips as they repudiate initial assessments of limited damage to the Iranian nuclear program so as to conform to the Trump regime’s “obliterated, destroyed, defeated” narrative.

On the other hand, you have reports that the Iranians, warned in advance the “bunker busters” would fall on the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites, removed their 400–kilograms of enriched uranium, not quite 900 pounds, to secret locations. Immediately after the bombs fell, Amwaj.media, a British-based digital publication that covers West Asia in English, Arabic and Farsi, reported this, citing “a high-ranking Iranian political source [who] also confirmed that the targeted sites were evacuated, with ‘most’ of Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium kept in secure locations.”  

“How can you tell,” Reuters asked in a June 29 report, “if enriched uranium stocks, some of them near weapons grade, were buried beneath the rubble or secretly hidden away?”

You cannot, it seems to me. Neither can President Trump or any of his adjutants. 

Then you have the granular analysis of reputable technologists such as Ted Postol, the gentlemanly scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who has over many years exploded more false flags, propaganda ops, and other such ruses than you’ve had hot dinners.

There is satellite imagery showing 16 tractor trailers lined up at Fordow in the days before the B–2s flew. Trump insists they were pouring concrete, a peculiar use of a truck of that sort, I have to say. It is magnitudes more plausible they were there to load the steel drums in which enriched uranium is commonly stored and shipped.

Postol gave the heavy-on-the-science interview to Daniel Davis, an Army veteran who now podcasts as a respected military analyst, after the Hegseth–Caine press conference. In the course of it, the joint chiefs chairman went full monty with slides, diagrams, satellite images, and graphics to show (or is snow my word?) the assembled reporters just how true the obliterated-destroyed-defeated story is.

“What it clearly shows is that the bottom of the shaft [formed by the bombs] is still sealed,” Postol said of Caine’s presentation. “Caine is probably a good soldier, but he doesn’t know much science. You cannot succeed with this kind of attack. It was destined to fail.”

Postol also proves astute as to the political dynamics of the administration’s shape-shifting accounts of the Iranian mission: “This is a circus, a political circus to try to minimize the embarrassment to President Trump for having spoken without any knowledge.”

Where are we, then? As Postol points out during his exchange with Davis, “You can’t trust the media and you can’t trust the intelligence community.” What happened and what is going to happen next? These are the questions we are left to consider more or less on our own.

Strange as it may seem, I find it easier to anticipate the future than to conclude with certainty what it is that those B–2s and their 30,000–pound bombs actually got done.

It may be that we are doomed never to know the extent of the damage the Air Force’s aerial operation caused. But, staying short of convictions as we must, I put my stock in those reports that the Iranians had advance notice that the B–2s were coming. I have heard no official denial on this point. And so much of contemporary warfare is weirdly choreographed, after all. In this case, telling Tehran the battle plan would serve to reduce the danger — danger the International Atomic Energy Agency warned of prior to the operation — of a catastrophic release of radioactive material into the atmosphere.  

And there is the science, such as unscientific minds, mine among them, can understand it. I have found Ted Postol a careful, persuasive witness ever since he discredited those false-flag chemical weapons incidents in Syria at the height of the Western-run operation to bring down the Assad regime. Take a look at the video of his talk with Daniel Davis. He did the same thing this time: Here are the physics, here the thermodynamics, this is what would have to have happened if the obliteration story was true, and here is how we know it did not happen.

As to what is likely to come next, we can usefully read events as mirrors of intentions.

I think it is true that Hegseth, Caine and others among Trump’s sycophantic appointees are protecting the president from ignominy — or more ignominy, better to say — as they flood the zone with pseudoscience and, in Hegseth’s case, shrill exhortations to print and broadcast media to stop with the reporting and get with the patriotic propaganda. (Read the transcript linked above for the full taste of these crude harangues.)

But there is more to President Trump than his obvious concern for appearances. In my view he is very eager to avoid any circumstance that would require another American air campaign in Iranian airspace. He wants neither the risk nor the responsibility. This is how, paradoxically, I read his warning the other day that he will bomb again if Iran resumes its enrichment processes. When Trump drops threats like granite boulders we can read in them what he actually wants. In this case it is another way of saying, “Please stay with the ceasefire and short of the nuclear stuff.”

With Trump, it is as it was with Joe Biden and numerous of their predecessors. One can never tell the extent to which Trump, is willing to restrain the Israelis as they advance their aggressions — which any American regime could do in very short order — and the extent to which he pretends to be willing to restrain the Israelis but has no intention of doing so because of the Israel lobbies.  

The New York Times ran a report Monday, June 29, under the headline, “Israel’s Military Appears Poised to Expand Into Gaza City Amid Cease-Fire Calls.” While Trump and his national-security people press for a ceasefire in Gaza — with what degree of vigor we do not know — the Zionist state just ordered Palestinians to evacuate the Strip’s main city after not operating here for many months. So they seem to be going in yet again. “There has been no advancement in the ceasefire talks,” The Times, quoting two Israeli officials and another unnamed source, reported.

This development has nothing and everything to do with Israel’s current posture toward Iran, as I interpret it. Israel has as little intention of ceasing its operations against Iran, now that they are finally underway, as it does to end its genocidal ethnic-cleansing of the Palestinians of Gaza. These aggressions are both fronts in what the Israelis call their “seven-front war” across West Asia, and we must not lose sight of this. We witness a thematically unified campaign of terror. There is no place in it for ceasefires, peaceful coexistence or anything else short of total victory.

As in Gaza, so in the West Bank, and as in Gaza and the West Bank, so in Lebanon, and as in these three, so in Iran. I see no chance whatsoever that the Israelis consider themselves done with the Islamic Republic. Destroying the nation’s nuclear program, wrecking the economy and essential infrastructure, creating a state of political chaos, assassinating or otherwise decapitating the leadership: All this appears to be under discussion among Israel’s war planners.

It is merely a matter of time before the Zionist state resumes its aggressions. Then there will be more questions, chief among them what the United States and the rest of the West will do as more barbarities unfold before the world’s eyes.

Disqus