Saturday, November 30, 2024

"Deception, manipulation, sabotage: How the UK works to keep the Ukraine war going" by Tarik Cyril Amar

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: RT

Deception, manipulation, sabotage: How the UK works to keep the Ukraine war going

Leaked papers expose a secret military operation that includes planning attacks, suppressing media and brainwashing the British public
Deception, manipulation, sabotage: How the UK works to keep the Ukraine war going

Unless you want to be blind, it is obvious that Ukraine under the Zelensky regime is not remotely a free country. In politics, after massive repression, there are only remnants of an opposition, which face continuing oppression and harassment by the government, as even the French newspaper Le Monde, generally naïve about the Zelensky regime, has reported.

Ukraine’s public sphere is stifled by nationalist propaganda, pressure, and demonstrative, intimidating terror. Before the escalation of 2022, even a robustly propagandistic tool of Western information warfare such as Freedom House could still acknowledge that much: its 2018 report, authored by Ukrainian researcher Vyacheslav Likhachev, identified Ukraine’s Far Right organizations as “a threat to democracy” and “aggressively trying to impose their agenda on Ukrainian society, including by using force against those with opposite political and cultural views.”

Regarding Ukraine’s media, expect not much resistance from there. They are tightly controlled and, often, pro-actively obedient, whether out of misguided conviction, fear, or careerism. Even Ukraine’s Western supporters, as well as some courageous critics in Ukraine, have voiced criticism of the crude propaganda habits of the Zelensky regime.

Make no mistake: The authoritarian features of the rule of Vladimir Zelensky – formerly the object of a veritable Western personality cult that, by now, at least some devotees must feel embarrassed about – are not the result of the large-scale war. The politics of Zelenskyism, to coin an ugly but handy term, were always unusually deceitful and manipulative and, by 2021 at the latest, openly bending toward authoritarianism, as many Ukrainian critics pointed out at the time.

And yet: Imagine a future trial, maybe to be held in Ukraine, of Zelensky and his team. The defense would not be able to do much about their record of corruption, but it would certainly at least try to blame some of the former leader’s underhanded and tyrannical tendencies on the war. It would be a stretch, but lawyers have to do their best, even for the worst of clients.

In the case of the Western users of the Zelensky regime, though, such a defense would not be merely far-fetched but completely absurd. Yet a defense some of them at least might come to need. Take for instance the case of Britain’s Lieutenant General Charlie Stickland and his shadowy but numerous associates.

The unfortunately important general – boasting of his pirate ancestors and in charge of “UK-led joint and multinational overseas military operations” – and his motley crew have just been the object of an investigative exposé by Grayzone reporter Kit Klarenberg. In, for now, two articles, the Grayzone has detailed how, in 2022, Stickland set up a below-the-radar network of “an assortment of leading academics, authors, strategists, planners, pollsters, comms, data scientists and tech.” Under the name Project Alchemy and overlapping and liaising with another group of wannabe keyboard Ninjas calling themselves – I kid you not – “the Elders,” this conspiratorial group has worked on, in essence, keeping the Ukraine war going at any price and by means foul and fouler.

Based on leaked documents, the Grayzone’s reporting is revealing in more ways than can be discussed here. Yet, as we are dealing with prose authored by militant bureaucrats and self-weaponizing intellectuals in the land of George Orwell, that old stickler for the English language, we would be remiss not to appreciate their bizarre lingo. It brings together a certain jejune rugby field boyishness – “mischief” is proudly being made – with a militarized sociolect of corporatese: “fusion players” and “sideways thinkers” get “badged” and “meshed in” to “move at pace,” and – greatest pride of the eminent executive – stand ready to work over the weekend!   

Doing what exactly? All kinds of things, really, and all based on one stupid yet once immensely popular assumption: that the proxy war in Ukraine could be leveraged to defeat Russia, reduce it to geopolitical insignificance, impose regime change on it, and even break it up. Some, including the new de facto foreign minister of the EU, Estonia’s Kaja Kallas – imagine Annalena Baerbock, but without the brilliant intellect – still seem to be on that political equivalent of an LSD trip gone terribly wrong. What a hangover it will be one day, probably soon.

In Britain, highlights of Project Alchemy groupthink included hatching plans for stay-behind sabotage networks and recommending the example of the underground Gladio operations that NATO ran in Western – not, please note, Eastern – Europe during the Cold War. Strictly speaking, Gladio was an Italian label, while the same bad idea had different names in other countries. By now, though, Gladio stands for a whole plethora of clandestine organizations set up, ostentatiously, to engage in partisan resistance in case of a Soviet attack and occupation.

You may feel that, in principle at least, for generals, preparing for the possibility of future partisan warfare is not an objectionable activity. Yet the issue is that, in reality, the Gladio operations were not only extremely dubious in constitutional and legal terms, as being entirely beyond democratic control and oversight, as well as tied to foreign intelligence services. In addition, these networks served to fight a dirty war against the domestic left, including by terrorism, false-flag attacks, the systematic use of far-right conspirators and terrorists, and support for military coups.

An influential, black-ops-connected British general and his chums wanting to learn lessons from Gladio for underground networks in Ukraine? The country with the best-armed (compliments of the West), most whitewashed and naively underestimated (compliments of the Western media and self-weaponizing intellectuals of the Anne Applebaum/Tim Snyder variety), most aggressive, and most militarized far right in the world? Swimming in arms right next to an EU-NATO Europe they will soon feel bitterly disappointed by? What could possibly go wrong? But maybe Charlie 'Pirate' Stickland is “fusion”-”thinking” “sideways” in Churchillian terms: “Set Europe Ablaze!” Yet Stickland seems to have overlooked that Churchill wanted to set it ablaze against the Nazis, not with them.

All of this is, in and of itself, very bad, if unsurprising, news. But Project Alchemy has been prolific, producing lousy ideas the way Russian industry is churning out artillery shells and missiles. There also were: a frank emphasis on “creatively using” – let’s be honest: breaking – the law so as to get silly violent things done, including “deniable ops”; a daft idea to attack the Kerch Bridge, as if Russia would not strike back (both have by now happened, the militarily useless attack and the painful payback); an anticipatory strategy of how to manipulate the British public in case it should get tired of pumping money into the proxy war; attempts to undermine BRICS-plus (thinking big and bigger); plans to shut down Russian media in the West, obviously; and, last but not least, an aggressive strategy to use covert lawfare and deliberate financial pressure to bring down Western critical media as well, including, as it happens, the Grayzone. Say what you will, but Stickland and company seem to have had a foreboding from where exactly they would get their richly deserved come-uppance.

It would be tempting to think of this wave of disinformation and manipulation in the West as a kind of “Ukrainization.” As if the West had caught the contagion of the Zelensky regime’s very bad habits. But to be fair, the West has its own, well-established tradition of waging war by massive lying on the home front. In 2019, it was the Washington Post, usually hewing close to the American government line, that ran a series of in-depth stories detailing how, during the West’s long war in Afghanistan, started almost two decades before, the US had been “at war with the truth.” Suddenly, clearly in preparation of the impending Western retreat, readers were allowed to learn that while “officials constantly said they were making progress,” they “were not, and they knew it.”

And the name of that Washington Post series? The Afghanistan Papers. That, of course, was a reference to the famous Pentagon Papers, an internal and classified Defense Department review of US policy and warfare in Vietnam that was leaked to the New York Times by the historic – and heroic – whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, who suffered severe, criminal attempts to silence, and in effect, destroy him. The long American intervention, begun indirectly in the 1940s and escalating into one of the most brutal US campaigns of the twentieth century in the 1960s, only ended with the total defeat of both Washington and its South Vietnamese proxy in 1975.

The New York Times began to publish the Pentagon Papers in 1971. Once again, as with the later bloody Western fiasco in Afghanistan, the moment of truth – some truth – came late, only toward the end of a policy catastrophe that had long been supported by compliant mainstream media. The Grayzone is considered alternative media, and its reporters are doing a much better job at real journalism than their competition in the mainstream version. As to them, they clearly have not yet reached the stage of always-too-late revelation that, during the proxy wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan, was marked by 1971 and 2019, respectively.

How do we know? They are ignoring the Grayzone’s sensational revelations about a military-think-tank-industry conspiracy to undermine the law, deliberately manipulate the public, and wage proxy war in a way that is both dirty and bound to backfire very badly on the West itself. One more sign that all too many in the West are not yet ready to face reality, even while the Ukrainians they claim to help but only use keep dying.

"Canadian police treating Nazi monument as war memorial -- media" from RT

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: RT


Canadian police treating Nazi monument as war memorial – media

A journalist is facing prison time for allegedly defacing a statue to Ukrainian Nazi collaborators at a cemetery in Alberta
Canadian police treating Nazi monument as war memorial – media

Police and prosecutors in the Canadian province of Alberta have classed a monument to Ukrainian veterans who fought for Nazi Germany as a protected “war memorial,” for the purpose of charging a journalist who allegedly defaced it, according to news website The Maple.

The Canadian government has previously been accused by Russia of protecting Nazi war criminals who emigrated to the country after WWII.

Police in the city of Edmonton in the province of Alberta claim that journalist Duncan Kinney vandalized the structure in St. Michael’s Cemetery. The monument honoring Ukrainian veterans of the SS “1st Galician Division” was sprayed with the words “Nazi Monument 14th Waffen SS” in August 2021.

The 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS consisted mostly of Western Ukrainians, and was implicated in war crimes. Many of its members immigrated to Canada after WWII.

According to police, Kinney was also arrested and charged in October 2022 with one count of “mischief relating to war memorials” for allegedly spraying the words “Actual Nazi” on a statue of a Ukrainian nationalist and Nazi collaborator Roman Shukhevych located at the Ukrainian Youth Unity Complex in Edmonton.

Shukhevych was involved in the massacre of tens of thousands of Poles and Jews during the Second World War.

RT

The journalist has denied the allegations and is contesting the charges in court, The Maple wrote. If found guilty, he could be sent to prison for up to 10 years. Kinney's legal defence has argued that he has been deliberately targeted by police for investigating “numerous” cases of misconduct in the force.

According to Polish-born former Alberta deputy premier and cabinet minister Thomas Lukaszuk, the authorities are misinterpreting the law by extending the protection it offers to Canada’s wartime enemies and those who committed war crimes.

”I think it clearly shows that Edmonton police and the Crown prosecutor’s office… are lacking, grossly, in historical knowledge,” Lukaszuk told The Maple.

The monument to Ukrainian SS veterans, allegedly defaced by Kinney, has a family link to Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, The Maple noted.

Freeland’s maternal grandfather, Michael Chomiak, served as a Nazi propagandist in occupied Poland during the war and helped to raise the money for the monument, journalist and author Peter McFarlane told the outlet.

One member of the 1st Galician Division was 99-year-old Yaroslav Hunka, who received two standing ovations in the Canadian parliament in September 2023 during Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky’s visit. The parliamentary speaker later resigned over the incident, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issued an apology.

Russia has accused Canada of “whitewashing” the crimes of Adolf Hitler’s regime by failing to prosecute the former Nazi soldier, and rejecting a request by Moscow to extradite Hunka.

Friday, November 29, 2024

"For future memory of western decadence" by José Goulão

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: Strategic Culture Foundation

For Future Memory of Western Decadence

José Goulão
November 28, 2024

The “international order based on rules is not written, it is not possible to find it in any document or treaty, it is the result of the casuistic interpretation of facts often created artificially.

Join us on TelegramTwitter, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

The BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) summit held on October 25th in Kazan, in the Russian Federation, managed to bring together around 50 high-level delegations from other countries, it was the first with the participation of four new full members – Egypt, Ethiopia, United Arab Emirates and Iran – and created a group of partners highly in tune with the spirit of the organization: Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Turkey (member of NATO), Uganda, Uzbekistan and Vietnam.

This is no small feat on the world stage. Furthermore, the BRICS interact on an equal footing, value above all the independence and sovereignty of each State involved in the process and negotiate among themselves according to mutually advantageous perspectives, the absolute denial of the imperial spirit still dominant in the system. of life on the planet.

The difference in behaviour, objectives and intentions of this rising renewing group compared to the aggressive but decadent behaviours of the Western world is the great confrontation of our days: between the old imperial and colonial order imposed manu-militari, financial, economic, political and propagandistic by the obsolete minority of the countries of the so-called collective West, the aforementioned rules-based international order; and the full restoration of International Law, the founding principle of BRICS and several other associations of emerging nations such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Eurasian Economic Union, the Belt and Road Initiative, the Association of Southeast Asian Countries (ASEAN) itself) which, step by step, refocus the world’s greatest weight on Eurasia and institute new non-imperial and non-colonial, that is, non-Western, relationship mechanisms.

However, we live in “the hour of monsters”. The sociopaths who, giving vent to the genocidal vocation, of which the actions of extermination and ethnic cleansing carried out by Zionism – in “defense of the West” – and the murderous prolongation of the war in Ukraine sponsored by Western desperation are flagrant examples, increasingly assume with greater and alarming frequency, there are no limits to the possible use of weapons to exterminate life on the planet.

The “international order based on rules is not written, it is not possible to find it in any document or treaty, it is the result of the casuistic interpretation of facts often created artificially and supposed realities that are nothing more than lies or falsifications so that the “ Western interests”, confused, in a permanent coup system, with the rights of all peoples and nations.

The “law” on which the global West is based does not exist, it is not legitimate in the international legal system: it is proof of the fraud that what is still called the “Rule of Law” has become.

In short, the “rules-based international order” is an abuse of authoritarian, undemocratic power, with undeniable fascist overtones that seeks to manage the entire planet by force and under which numerous countries on all continents are still subjugated. It is nothing more than a fiction as an instrument of Law and military, economic, political and diplomatic relations, but we will all be capable, depending on the experience we are living, of recording it in print. It will, without a doubt, be a useful exercise for future memory, now that authentic International Law is gaining new momentum in direct proportion to the failure of the power of the “rules” to which the West continues to cling like a shipwreck.

I elaborate on these lines only one possible version. Any citizen immune to the media control helmet will be able to write their variant; which will certainly not be very different in content.

Here is, therefore, my proposal for the “rules-based international order” to be documented – even if against the will and, obviously, without authorization of those who apply it and thus violate all our rights as citizens.

Rules-Based International Order – The Rules

1. The United States of America is the only Indispensable nation, the Exceptional nation, which is responsible for guiding and commanding the Collective West in defending its interests on any continent, ocean, regions and also in space.

2. The United States of America is the model of the only Democracy recognized as such across the planet and the only financial, economic, military and political system that can be practiced in the world: which results from the full and free functioning of the Market according to principles established in the 1989 Washington Consensus; These norms regulate the implementation and globalization of the neoliberal system inspired by the absolute authority of the theory and practice of the Austrian School of economic thought and applied in full for the first time, through the Chicago School and with recognized success, in the Chilean Revolution of 1973 – which put an end to an inhumane and deviant socialist system.

  • Paragraph 1. The United States and the collective West will be able to tolerate and support expressions and regimes of a fascist, Nazi and Zionist nature if they are essential for the defense of Western interests and the liquidation of theories, currents and political-economic organizations that are inimical to the Market, alien to the Our Civilization and whose sole objective, as extreme expressions of barbarism, is to exterminate and extinguish it completely.
  • Paragraph 2 – The United States and Western countries have the duty and obligation to impose, if necessary through force and other dissuasive methods of intervention, including the correction of existing regimes, the holding of general elections in all nations of the planet according to the unique model, that of Liberal Democracy, originally founded and practiced in the United States of America. Any election results presented as fair and legitimate in any nation on the planet and that do not correspond to the interests of the West and the absolute freedom of the Market will be considered falsified and manipulated, a necessary and sufficient reason for them not to be recognized by Western nations. These nations, primarily the United States of America, reserve the duty to enforce that these entities are isolated, excluded and punished within the international community defined by this International Rules-Based Order.

3. As an Exceptional nation and the only Indispensable one, the United States will not allow the economic and military growth of any other nation, community, union, alliance or association of countries that makes it capable of rivalling or calling into question the innate North American role as guide and commander of world order. This unquestionable principle is also valid in relation to the essential, preventive and permanent containment of the dimensions of the international role that the European Union could hypothetically achieve.

4. The civilizing, religious, civic and human principles followed in the Collective West give shape to the only Civilization that can be considered as such, superior and predominant over any uses, practices and customs followed outside the Western space, which must be considered expressions of societies still in a savage and barbaric state. Superior Civilization is currently expressed through the only democratic, financial, economic, military, political and media system that must be imposed throughout the world until the full realization of globalism – a world without borders and without nations other than, as set out in Article 1, the one Indispensable nation or the One World Government sponsored by It.

5. The West, under the command of the United States of America – a mission previously carried out by other great nations equally inspired by God, Faith, Civilization, Humanism and Authority – has the right, duty and obligation to extend Superior Civilization to all the planet by all means at its disposal.

6. War is the excellent means of defending Western interests; therefore, the possibility of it being used against violators of this International Rules-Based Order will always be open. The West has every right – and obligation – to resort to War whenever Western institutions, with or without UN approval, conclude or even suspect that their interests are being harmed, at risk or threatened. Economic and political sanctions and the use of popular revolutions, also known as colour revolutions, do not replace War itself, they can be useful in achieving the objective of making it easier, more effective and less expensive in terms of Western human lives.

7. Peace is the state or situation found at the end of any War fought and won by Western forces. This is the only and authentic concept of Peace. Pacifist theories and pacifism serve, in practice, to fuel risks and attacks against Western rights and interests, so that they are nothing more than unacceptable and inadmissible manifestations of barbarism.

8. Sole paragraph. As long as traces of manifestations of savagery and barbarism remain, War must be the main concern in the formation and functioning of Western societies. Expensive social areas, often oversized in importance, such as health, education, housing, culture and ecology, must obey the rules of the Market through their full inclusion in the private sector; they will no longer be costly and will become profitable, reducing to a minimum, in this transformative path, the circumstances that still affect the budgetary means indispensable to guarantee the functioning, under ideal conditions, of a permanent state of War.

9. NATO is the only military alliance acceptable and permitted on the international stage and compatible with the defense of Western rights and this International Rules-Based Order. With the entry into force of the Washington Consensus, which is mandatory, NATO no longer has boundaries for its activities as an alliance or within the framework of other variants or versions, notably freedom fighters and other types of altruistic international soldiers committed to freedoms. and democracy (not comparable to mercenaries). Therefore, the Western Military Alliance has the right, duty and obligation to act anywhere on the planet where there are aggressions, threats or suspected threats to Western interests.

10. The Western concept of Security allows and gives the right to Western military contingents to expand to the borders, to surround or even attack and dismantle countries or groups of countries that the West defines as its enemies or barbarians. The Security of any Western country or interest can and must be achieved even if the actions taken harm the security, or even the existence, of third non-Western entities.

11. The enjoyment of the world’s natural wealth and raw materials belongs, by definition based on secular adverse possession, to Western Civilization, and it is up to the United States of America, as an Exceptional and Indispensable nation, to manage and redistribute it among the community of Western nations. For humanist reasons, Western Civilization may allow non-Western entities, even in a savage and barbaric state, under strict control and in the face of proven needs, to use some of these assets in instalments – with the condition that this does not result in the minimum harm to Western interests.

  • Paragraph 1. The fight against climate change is fought under the exclusive command of Our Civilization. Any transnational measure of ecological and environmental content and the green transition itself must take into account the free, superior and sovereign functioning of the Market.
  • Paragraph 2. Western control of the world’s natural wealth and raw materials, as well as the fight against climate change, could lead to the resort to War whenever it is concluded or suspected that the interests of Our Civilization and the freedom of the Market are not duly respected.

12. The only version of reality that exists in the world at any given moment is the one conveyed by the military, financial, economic, political and multiplatform media powers formed by the main global media groups. The unquestionable definition of global reality at each moment may have nuances according to cultural and political expressions that are expressed in the West – but without ever calling into question the only accepted truth. It is the obligation of Western economic-financial, military, political and communication institutions to silence and punish expressions of interests and opinions alien to and contrary to Our Civilization, invariably tuned to and sponsored by barbarism, making it urgent to accelerate this process on the Internet.

The Nations of the Collective West are free to accept or not the entry of refugees foreign to Our Civilization who seek to circumvent, almost always for opportunistic and selfish reasons, the inevitable consequences, such as collateral damage, of wars conducted by Western forces in defense of Western interests. Strict respect for the functioning of the Market determines that the quotas for these admissions are defined only by economic criteria, notably those dictated by the needs of cyclical filling of jobs in indispensable activities but which are less worthy of the state of development and principles of Our Civilization.

Special Article. The State of Israel, although located in geographically eastern territories, is an integral and inalienable part of the Collective West and Our Civilization; It is up to him, notably, to defend Western interests in the region by all the means and methods at his disposal, receiving for this purpose from Western countries, communities, unions, regions and alliances, at each moment, the financial, economic, political, and propaganda and, above all, military and weapons to achieve this essential task and the Rules-Based International Order is strictly applied.

The territory of Israel does not need defined borders, it can be expanded through the occupation, by any means, of the territories between the Nile and Euphrates rivers that it considers indispensable for its security and that of the entire West, because it lives surrounded by barbaric enemies fiercely attached to wild and savage methods. The Zionist doctrine, humanist and divinely mandated, notably regarding the millennial legitimacy of sovereignty over its territory, is an inseparable and irreplaceable component of Western Civilization, especially in geostrategic, geopolitical, military and religious terms through exclusively Western expressions of Faith, Hope, Charity and Piety.

Israel must diplomatically have the entire West on its side in the face of barbaric attempts to achieve its isolation and subsequent disappearance. The so-called “two-state solution”, occasionally and conjunctural defended by authoritative Western voices, emanates only from so-called international law, so it is absolutely incompatible with the Rules-Based International Order.

How much longer will we, the Western people, accept to live according to these rules?

"Is NATO’s Indo-Pacific strategy in Europe’s own interests?" by Laura Ruggeri

 

Click here for Exit the Cuckoo's Nest's posting standards and aims.

Source: Laura Ruggeri's Substack


It's always a pleasure to be interviewed by knowledgeable people who ask probing questions. Sonja Van den Ende, a fellow writer for Strategic Culture, set my train of thought in motion. Here is the first question. "Is NATO’s Indo-Pacific strategy in Europe’s own interests?" What follows is my answer.

NATO’s Indo-Pacific strategy is a component of NATO’s expansionist endeavors to buttress US hegemony. If we were to explain this strategy to a child, we could say its main objective is to “Keep the Americans in, the Chinese out, and the Russians down”, to paraphrase NATO’s first Secretary General, Lord Hastings, who famously said that NATO was created to “keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.”

While US influence in the Asia-Pacific is rapidly waning, China’s is growing. But since the US is unable to match China’s investments, trade and economic relations with Asian countries, it’s hyping non-existing security threats to impose ‘bloc thinking’ on the states in the Asia-Pacific region, force them to take sides and coerce its allies to fork out more money for defense.

Previous attempts to damage economic relations between China and US allies had focused on ‘human rights and democracy’ but they mostly fell on deaf ears and may have actually contributed to China’s gains in political and cultural influence in the region. That’s why I fear that the US will ramp up its efforts to undermine regional security. NATO’s growing involvement is part of this strategy.

As far as the US is concerned this strategy was quite successful in Europe as it led to a breakdown in the relationship between Russia and most European countries. Obviously, if we look at it from a European perspective, it was a disaster with a tragic outcome.

NATO’s growing presence in the Asia-Pacific has multiple, mainly negative, implications for the stability, peace and prosperity of the region, and by extension for the global economy, including Europe’s, since Asia is the world’s growth engine.

The US has a tendency to impose its ‘friends vs foes’ Manichean model as a divide et impera strategy. This approach to foreign policy is in stark contrast to the way countries in the Asia-Pacific region manage differences and conflicting interests – by and large they prioritise economic development and seek common ground for cooperation. Painting someone into a corner is not considered a very successful strategy, as it leads to an exacerbation of conflict.

By dragging NATO into the Asia Pacific the US is trying to destroy the limited strategic autonomy EU countries have in managing their relations with China and regional actors. I fear Sino-European relations are about to become a lot more complicated if NATO gets involved. So far European economic elites have been more reluctant to take clear sides in the China-US rivalry than over the war in Ukraine.

It’s worth noting that the tone of NATO’s references to China in official documents started to change in 2019. In 2020 Stoltenberg declared “China does not share our values”. In its 2022 Strategic Concept NATO formally classified China as “a challenge to the organisation’s interests, security and values” and identified the Indo-Pacific as important for the North Atlantic Alliance, claiming that “developments in that region can directly affect Euro Atlantic security.”

The claim that Euro Atlantic security is being jeopardized by China’s influence in the Asia-Pacific is preposterous. If anything, it’s the US massive military presence in the region that is a major concern. Not only has the US been building more military bases near China, Washington is also demonstratively provoking Beijing by strengthening and rallying the anti-China coalition in that region as part of its policy of confrontation and containment of China. In recent years it has orchestrated and funded colour revolutions on Chinese soil (Taipei and Hong Kong), is arming and funding fifth columns, anti-government and separatist forces throughout Asia to destabilize China- friendly countries. As to the cultivation of political and economic elites to be subordinated to and dependent on the US and other former colonial powers, well, Washington has never stopped doing that.

NATO claims to be “a bulwark of the rules-based international order” but this view is not shared by most of the world . NATO’s bloody legacy speaks for itself and this military organisation is widely distrusted. Originally conceived as a collective security alliance to counter the Soviet Union, NATO has since morphed into a tool to assert Western dominance. It is evident that NATO’s presence in the Indo-Pacific, to use an American definition, can only have a detrimental effect on the peace and stability of a part of the world that since the end of the Cold War has largely avoided hostile dynamics preferring to build economic and diplomatic connections to manage regional conflict.

In its ambition to encircle China and isolate Russia within the region, NATO is stepping up its cooperation with other US-led military alliances to increase military-technological interoperability between the Indo-Pacific and the Euro-Atlantic regions. I am referring to AUKUS (Australia, UK, US), to the Australia and Japan mutual defense treaties with the US, and to the Squad (US, Australia, Japan and the Philippines) which is posited as a more aggressive version of the QUAD.

From a Chinese perspective, NATO is a US-led European military alliance that is establishing a strong working relationship with Japan, a former imperial power that invaded their country, brutalized and killed millions of people. NATO’s presence brings back memories of the “century of humiliation”, the period of subjugation China suffered under imperialism, both Western and Japanese. From a more broadly Asian perspective, NATO’s expansion cannot be separated from the painful history of European colonialism and imperialism that shaped modern Asia and that the West has never fully acknowledged.

Is it in Europe’s interest to be associated with that legacy? Do Europeans really think that military projection in the region is not going to have a negative impact on their diplomatic and economic relations with Asian countries? The problem is that EU countries have become captive of US objectives, they are not allowed to have interests that diverge from American ones.

In its unbounded conceit, the EU is now laying claims to the role of security actor in the Asia-Pacific region in addition to presenting itself as a normative and economic actor. All at the same time. It is so detached from reality that it doesn’t even realize the dissonance of these roles.

If you need further proof that the EU has morphed into an appendage of NATO, just take a look at how its strategy towards China changed in sync with NATO’s in less than five years.

In 2018, when the EU launched the first overarching strategy aimed at Asian countries, the EU–Asia Connectivity Strategy, it was open-minded about cooperation with China though this initiative was primarily a response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It promised investment based on an alternative developmental model that emphasized norms such as “rule of law, human rights, good governance, and sustainability”. It turned out to be nothing more than a Soft Power exercise: the Connectivity Strategy argued that connectivity goes beyond transport, energy, and digital networks to include people-to-people connectivity, somewhat confusing connectivity and mobility. As a matter of fact, it allocated the greater part of resources to promoting and supporting the mobility of students, researchers, activists and artists. Guess what? One of the main beneficiaries of its “civil society”outreach was Soros’ Open Society Foundations.

In 2021, the EU launched the Indo-Pacific Strategy, adopting the US preferred terminology. It expanded the geographical scope of the EU’s engagement and made explicit reference to security and strategic aims. Significantly, this strategy juxtaposes the EU and China arguing that the EU will “continue to protect its essential interests and promote its values while pushing back where fundamental disagreement exists with China, such as on human rights”.

Then came the Global Gateway Initiative in December 2021, which promised to support partner countries’ development by offering much larger funding opportunities. And in March 2022 the Strategic Compass set out the EU’s stance towards China, making no secret that it sees “China’s promotion of standards incompatible with EU preferences as a threat contributing to systemic rivalry.” It stated that “in an increasingly hostile security environment the EU must accomplish a quantum leap forward in making the EU a stronger more capable security provider.” Adding that the EU seeks to “secure sea lines of communication, capacity-building and enhanced naval presence in the Indo-Pacific.”

Its new emphasis on hard power capabilities in the area of security and defence closely reflects NATO’s.

The EU is trying to justify this new focus on security and defense by pointing out that the region hosts major waterways that are of vital importance to EU trade, including the Malacca Straits, the South China Sea, and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. But since the US and the EU are China’s most important trading partners, it goes without saying that it is also in Beijing’s interest to ensure these waterways remain open to commercial traffic.

China is an export powerhouse, its prosperity is largely predicated on its ability to freely trade with the rest of the world, which requires regional peace and stability. It is obvious that the country has a stake in the preservation of these favourable conditions.

As a matter of fact, China’s cooperation with Asia-Pacific countries is testament to China's constructive role in maintaining regional stability and security. China is also developing this cooperation within multilateral formats, such as the forum of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) the Comprehensive Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) the Belt and Road Initiative, The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and BRICS+.

Disqus